BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR from Acro

Expert replies
by Giorgio » Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:42 am
Bio diesel is a fuel that can be used in most road vehicles instead of gasoline. Its use produces significantly less air pollution, Market research predicts that as this fuel becomes more widely available over the next ten years or so , hundreds of thousands of drivers will use it . We can only conclude , then, that many people care about reducing pollution.

Which of the following , if true , most strengthens this argument?

A) Many individuals try to minimize their driving in order to reduce pollution.

B) Bio diesel fuel costs 10% to 20% more than gasoline.

C) New environmental laws may require a reduction in amount of pollution new cars produce.

D) A significant amount of air pollution comes from sources other than automobiles.

E) Increased use of bio diesel will reduce the need to import gasoline form other countries.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by komal » Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:47 am
Giorgio wrote:Bio diesel is a fuel that can be used in most road vehicles instead of gasoline. Its use produces significantly less air pollution, Market research predicts that as this fuel becomes more widely available over the next ten years or so , hundreds of thousands of drivers will use it . We can only conclude , then, that many people care about reducing pollution.

Which of the following , if true , most strengthens this argument?

A) Many individuals try to minimize their driving in order to reduce pollution.
Correct : This provides support to the conclusion that many ppl care about reducing pollution.

B) Bio diesel fuel costs 10% to 20% more than gasoline.
Incorrect : Cost is not the issue here. Pollution is the issue.

C) New environmental laws may require a reduction in amount of pollution new cars produce.
Incorrect : Amount of pollution that new cars emit is irrelevant to the scope of the argument.

D) A significant amount of air pollution comes from sources other than automobiles.
Incorrect : Issue is not about other sources of air pollution.

E) Increased use of bio diesel will reduce the need to import gasoline form other countries.
Incorrect : Import-Export is out of scope.
Hope this helps : )
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:59 am
Join the discussion

by Giorgio » Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:29 am
komal wrote:
Giorgio wrote:Bio diesel is a fuel that can be used in most road vehicles instead of gasoline. Its use produces significantly less air pollution, Market research predicts that as this fuel becomes more widely available over the next ten years or so , hundreds of thousands of drivers will use it . We can only conclude , then, that many people care about reducing pollution.

Which of the following , if true , most strengthens this argument?

A) Many individuals try to minimize their driving in order to reduce pollution.
Correct : This provides support to the conclusion that many ppl care about reducing pollution.

B) Bio diesel fuel costs 10% to 20% more than gasoline.
Incorrect : Cost is not the issue here. Pollution is the issue.

C) New environmental laws may require a reduction in amount of pollution new cars produce.
Incorrect : Amount of pollution that new cars emit is irrelevant to the scope of the argument.

D) A significant amount of air pollution comes from sources other than automobiles.
Incorrect : Issue is not about other sources of air pollution.

E) Increased use of bio diesel will reduce the need to import gasoline form other countries.
Incorrect : Import-Export is out of scope.
Hope this helps : )
I Agree , but you'll be shocked now OA is : B funny yeah?
Join the discussion

by komal » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:34 am
Giorgio wrote:
I Agree , but you'll be shocked now OA is : B funny yeah?
wowwwwwww we need some expert explanations here.
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:45 am
I too belong to A camp.

We are told to strengthen the conclusion - many people care about reducing pollution, only option A shows that people are conscious about pollution and so they prefer to reduce driving to cut pollution.

B, in fact, weakening the conclusion, in that its trying to focus the usage of Bio diesel by people mainly to save cost. People don't care about pollution but for cost and so they are using the Bio Diesel.

Q stem says - most strengthens this argument? Do u think something fishy here..argument or it should have been conclusion ?
Join the discussion

by Giorgio » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:51 am
I have just completed ARCO's CAT , and this question is form there, I just reviewed my performance and the test is completely out of the space. I got 60 in Q huh?

and 32 in V, but questions were very controversial , like this one.
Join the discussion

by akahuja143 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:57 am
My Pick would be A
Join the discussion

by vijay_venky » Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:36 pm
I am between A and B.

A- This clearly states that many individuals try to minimize their driving in order to reduce the pollution.

B- This actually strengthens the conclusion by proving that though the price of Bio-diesel is greater than that of gasoline, people on the survey say they will use it. This strengthens the conclusion that pollution concern is the reason.

Please help me in reasoning out why B is incorrect.
Join the discussion

by outreach » Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:07 am
I will stick with B

A) Many individuals try to minimize their driving in order to reduce pollution.
Incorrect : This statement does not support the statement "Market research predicts that as this fuel becomes more widely available over the next ten years or so , hundreds of thousands of drivers will use it".

B) Bio diesel fuel costs 10% to 20% more than gasoline.
Correct : Though the cost has increased, people are ready to use the bio diesel fuel

C) New environmental laws may require a reduction in amount of pollution new cars produce.
Incorrect : Out of scope.

D) A significant amount of air pollution comes from sources other than automobiles.
Incorrect : Out of scope.

E) Increased use of bio diesel will reduce the need to import gasoline form other countries.
Incorrect : Out of scope.
Join the discussion

by Bozena » Sun Feb 07, 2010 9:50 am
I think it should be C
Join the discussion

by Lance123 » Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:04 pm
outreach wrote:I will stick with B

A) Many individuals try to minimize their driving in order to reduce pollution.
Incorrect : This statement does not support the statement "Market research predicts that as this fuel becomes more widely available over the next ten years or so , hundreds of thousands of drivers will use it".

B) Bio diesel fuel costs 10% to 20% more than gasoline.
Correct : Though the cost has increased, people are ready to use the bio diesel fuel

C) New environmental laws may require a reduction in amount of pollution new cars produce.
Incorrect : Out of scope.

D) A significant amount of air pollution comes from sources other than automobiles.
Incorrect : Out of scope.

E) Increased use of bio diesel will reduce the need to import gasoline form other countries.
Incorrect : Out of scope.
I agree,

A adds nothing to the argument, it doesn't address bio diesel at all.

B is indeed correct as it clearly eludes to the fact that although this new Bio diesel will be more expensive than traditional fuels people are still willing to use it. Hence they are indeed concerned about its only other benefit. i.e. Better for the environment.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:11 am
B my pick...

Option shows motivation for reducing the pollution...(people choosing the biod even with the costs being higher)..

"A" may be eliminated only becuase there is no BioD link with the reduced usage....
Join the discussion

by hrishi19884 » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:24 am
outreach wrote:I will stick with B

A) Many individuals try to minimize their driving in order to reduce pollution.
Incorrect : This statement does not support the statement "Market research predicts that as this fuel becomes more widely available over the next ten years or so , hundreds of thousands of drivers will use it".

B) Bio diesel fuel costs 10% to 20% more than gasoline.
Correct : Though the cost has increased, people are ready to use the bio diesel fuel

C) New environmental laws may require a reduction in amount of pollution new cars produce.
Incorrect : Out of scope.

D) A significant amount of air pollution comes from sources other than automobiles.
Incorrect : Out of scope.

E) Increased use of bio diesel will reduce the need to import gasoline form other countries.
Incorrect : Out of scope.
As correctly indicated by outreach brother, this is the only reason why B superior to A

Reduction in the number of drivers --does not mean that pollution will be less.

It is highly possible that "one driver uses 2 or more cars" instead "one driver using only one car"

so pollution will increase or remain the same what it is now --- rules out

Answer is naturally B ;)
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Mon Feb 08, 2010 7:37 am
sumanr84 wrote:I too belong to A camp.

We are told to strengthen the conclusion - many people care about reducing pollution, only option A shows that people are conscious about pollution and so they prefer to reduce driving to cut pollution.

B, in fact, weakening the conclusion, in that its trying to focus the usage of Bio diesel by people mainly to save cost. People don't care about pollution but for cost and so they are using the Bio Diesel.

Q stem says - most strengthens this argument? Do u think something fishy here..argument or it should have been conclusion ?
Premise 1 : Bio diesel produces less pollution.
Premise 2 : research shows that many people will use it as it becomes widely available.
Conclusion: Many people care about reducing pollution.

Now imagine, despite being widely available, if bio diesel's price is more /gallon or /liter than gasoline and still, people are buying it. How will you justify the extra-spending ? They want their vehicles to pollute less.

which lends support to the conclusion :

=> many people who are buying bio-diesel care about reducing pollution.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion