Confused between two choices

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

Confused between two choices

by raunekk » Sat Jun 28, 2008 12:21 am
hi guys..in both of the following questions i was able to narrow down d choices to two..but ten choose the wrong answer.

12. Political theorist: The vast majority of countries that have a single political party have corrupt national governments, but some countries with a plurality of parties also have corrupt national governments. What all countries with corrupt national governments have in common, however, is the weakness of local governments.
If all of the political theorist’s statements are true, which one of the following must also be true?
(A) Every country with weak local government has a single political party.
(B) Some countries with local governments have a plurality of political parties.
(C) Some countries with weak local governments do not have corrupt national governments.
(D) The majority of countries with weak local governments have a single political party.
(E) Fewer multiparty countries than single party countries have weak local governments.


9. Every action has consequences and among the consequences of any action are other actions. And knowing whether an action is good requires knowing whether its consequences are good, but we cannot know the future, so good actions are impossible.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Some actions have only other actions as consequences.
(B) We can know that past actions were good.
(C) To know that an action is good requires knowing that refraining from performing it is bad.
(D) Only actions can be the consequences of other actions.
(E) For an action to be good we must be able to know that it is good.


4. Political scientist: The concept of freedom is hopelessly vague. Any definition of freedom will either exclude some acts that intuitively qualify as free or admit some acts that intuitively fall outside the concept. The notion of justice, fairness, and equality are equally indeterminate. This is why political organization should be disavowed as futile.
The reasoning in the argument is questionable because the argument
(A) generalizes from an unrepresentative sample to every political idea
(B) makes the unsupported claim that the concept of freedom is hopelessly vague
(C) ignores the fact that some people view freedom as indispensable
(D) fails to show any specific link between the vagueness of concepts such as freedom and the rejection of political organization
(E) is mounted by some who has vested interest in the rejection of political organization


OAs=B,E,D repectively
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 188
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:40 am
Location: INDIA
Thanked: 4 times

by senthil » Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:41 am
except the first one i.e 12 , I got the rest correct . The first one if read carefully I feel the very obvious answer wud be B .

Weakness of local govt is different from weak local govt .. is wat I feel


let me know if I am wrong

Senthil

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:44 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by loki.gmat » Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:42 am
i think it should be -
12 - E
9 - E
4 - D


Thanks!

Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:56 am
12th one is B only... thats what i have written with spoiler!!..but guys.. pls ...i need the explanation two...

for the 12th one i got stuck up between B and E...the question is from 1000cr..and i feel it shud b E..can u pls explain...

in 4th i got confused between A and D...why it cant be A??

and in 9th between B and E..why not B??

if possible pls so explain...


thx in advance

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:01 am

by desidoc9 » Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:26 pm
With reference to Q 9

The author assume that - " good actions are impossible"
Reason - " we can't know the future"

Basis - " For an action to be good we must be able to know that it is good. "

So author is trying to say - you have to know in advance that action will be good, which is not possible.

Option B - does not hold ground as the passage has nothing to do with past actions. it is not talking about things in hindsight
Also, option B "weakens" the argument.


Question 4
option A - "generalizes from an unrepresentative sample to every political idea "

How do you know that it is an unrepresentative sample ????
It has not been mentioned in the para.
Out of scope.

Also look at the assumption made - " freedom is linked to political structure without providing any basis"

So the answer is D

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:47 am

by TrizMA » Sat Jun 28, 2008 10:28 pm
raunekk, for 12th it's B because u need the statement to be always true. Let's see:


A: Not true coz weak local government can be in multiple party
B: Can't dismiss it. keep it. will give explanation later
C: not true. weak local govt means corrupt national govt
D: We don't know number of countries with single party or multiparties or how many countries have corrupt govt. so u can come up with some numbers for which this will be not true.
E: Same logic as D applies to E.

So u can reach B thru POE.

Other approach can be: B is stating "some countries with multiparties have local govt". We already know that multiparties govt have corruption and other characteristic which they must have is weak local govt. Hence it proves B i.e. some mulitpolitical parties countries have local govt

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:26 am

by khanshainur » Wed May 11, 2016 12:36 am
I am pretty sure that the right Answer is B