BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR #2

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:57 pm
Thanked: 4 times
by tom4lax » Sun Sep 06, 2009 7:40 am
Narrowed down the attached to B or C

OA isC

My question is, [spoiler]I understand the flaw in the argument, correlation does not equal causality. However, i had a difficult time finding the correct answer choice. I would have chosen B, which is wrong. Thoughts?[/spoiler][/spoiler]
Attachments
CR 2.jpg
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 104 times

by scoobydooby » Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:19 am
B is out as the conclusion (that laptop causes higher earnings) is not a restatement of a claim made earlier. in fact no claim was made earlier. the scientists just found that laptop owners earned more, they never deduced anything from it. it was just a finding, not a claim
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:57 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by tom4lax » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:30 pm
I guess my problem is that C does not state what I want it to.

Cause = Owning a Laptop
Effect = increased pay

This could be a coincidence or a case of reverse causality. But choice C says that evidence stated suggests that 1st thing caused the 2nd. I dont find that to be true at all... Frustrating.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times

by heshamelaziry » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:51 pm
tom4lax wrote:I guess my problem is that C does not state what I want it to.

Cause = Owning a Laptop
Effect = increased pay

This could be a coincidence or a case of reverse causality. But choice C says that evidence stated suggests that 1st thing caused the 2nd. I dont find that to be true at all... Frustrating.
What is first thing and second thing ? :o your description of the cause and effect above is correct. The answer is only correct if it means that the relationship is reversed, and to know that we need to know which is 1st and which is 2nd. How do you know this ?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:57 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by tom4lax » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:55 pm
I guess that 1st is owning a laptop and 2nd is earning more?? Wouldn't this actually strengthen the argument?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times

by heshamelaziry » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:11 pm
tom4lax wrote:I guess that 1st is owning a laptop and 2nd is earning more?? Wouldn't this actually strengthen the argument?
The way you understand the answer means the answer choice strengthen the arument. But, C says that this relationship is wrong, LAptop (C) and More money(E), because the first thing caused the second. Here it is not clear at all what he is referring to.

I difinitly will flunk a question like this.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times

by heshamelaziry » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:14 pm
Remeber that flaw in reasoning questions and Strengthen questions do not require lots of work to prove a choice to be correct or wrong. This answer choice has been constructed too poorly.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:57 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by tom4lax » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:15 pm
Yeah well unless you plan on taking the LSAT, I wouldn't worry about it too much. Good practice though.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:08 am
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:500

by boy141 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:05 pm
tom4lax wrote:I guess my problem is that C does not state what I want it to.

Cause = Owning a Laptop
Effect = increased pay

This could be a coincidence or a case of reverse causality. But choice C says that evidence stated suggests that 1st thing caused the 2nd. I dont find that to be true at all... Frustrating.
Amen to that. You have to find the flaw in the statement. If you own a laptop, will you make more money? How will you know? You don't. The logic is incorrect.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1