Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

CR #2

Expert replies
by tom4lax » Sun Sep 06, 2009 7:40 am
Narrowed down the attached to B or C

OA isC

My question is, [spoiler]I understand the flaw in the argument, correlation does not equal causality. However, i had a difficult time finding the correct answer choice. I would have chosen B, which is wrong. Thoughts?[/spoiler][/spoiler]
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by scoobydooby » Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:19 am
B is out as the conclusion (that laptop causes higher earnings) is not a restatement of a claim made earlier. in fact no claim was made earlier. the scientists just found that laptop owners earned more, they never deduced anything from it. it was just a finding, not a claim
Join the discussion

by tom4lax » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:30 pm
I guess my problem is that C does not state what I want it to.

Cause = Owning a Laptop
Effect = increased pay

This could be a coincidence or a case of reverse causality. But choice C says that evidence stated suggests that 1st thing caused the 2nd. I dont find that to be true at all... Frustrating.
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:51 pm
tom4lax wrote:I guess my problem is that C does not state what I want it to.

Cause = Owning a Laptop
Effect = increased pay

This could be a coincidence or a case of reverse causality. But choice C says that evidence stated suggests that 1st thing caused the 2nd. I dont find that to be true at all... Frustrating.
What is first thing and second thing ? :o your description of the cause and effect above is correct. The answer is only correct if it means that the relationship is reversed, and to know that we need to know which is 1st and which is 2nd. How do you know this ?
Join the discussion

by tom4lax » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:55 pm
I guess that 1st is owning a laptop and 2nd is earning more?? Wouldn't this actually strengthen the argument?
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:11 pm
tom4lax wrote:I guess that 1st is owning a laptop and 2nd is earning more?? Wouldn't this actually strengthen the argument?
The way you understand the answer means the answer choice strengthen the arument. But, C says that this relationship is wrong, LAptop (C) and More money(E), because the first thing caused the second. Here it is not clear at all what he is referring to.

I difinitly will flunk a question like this.
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:14 pm
Remeber that flaw in reasoning questions and Strengthen questions do not require lots of work to prove a choice to be correct or wrong. This answer choice has been constructed too poorly.
Join the discussion

by tom4lax » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:15 pm
Yeah well unless you plan on taking the LSAT, I wouldn't worry about it too much. Good practice though.
Join the discussion

by boy141 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:05 pm
tom4lax wrote:I guess my problem is that C does not state what I want it to.

Cause = Owning a Laptop
Effect = increased pay

This could be a coincidence or a case of reverse causality. But choice C says that evidence stated suggests that 1st thing caused the 2nd. I dont find that to be true at all... Frustrating.
Amen to that. You have to find the flaw in the statement. If you own a laptop, will you make more money? How will you know? You don't. The logic is incorrect.
Join the discussion