BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Computer Crimes Detective: A suspect monitored by our team

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:37 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Computer Crimes Detective: A suspect monitored by our team was witnessed logging into Website X. Soon thereafter, Website X crashed due to a Trojan virus attack, causing damages estimated at millions of dollars. The same suspect also logged into Website Y. An hour after the suspect signed out of Website Y, it was attacked by the same virus and, subsequently, crashed. This strongly suggests that the suspect is either a hacker who is using this virus to shut websites down, or an unwitting user infected with the virus.

A major flaw in the detective's argument above is that

A) the detective overlooks the fact that during the second attack, the suspect had already been disconnected
B) the detective ignores the possibility that two different people could have used the same computer
C) the detective confuses the person who wrote the virus with the person who deployed it
D) the detective connects the cases of Websites X and Y and supposes that a pattern exists
E) the detective ignores the possibility that other people may have also been logged into the websites the same time that the suspect was

OA E

Source: Economist Gmat
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sat Jul 13, 2019 10:44 pm
OPTION A INCORRECT
This doesn't seem to be a flaw judging from the fact that both websites crashed after the suspect logged in not minding if he was still in or already logged out.

OPTION B INCORRECT
The possibility that two different people could have used the same computer is not very much feasible because the detective claimed to have monitored the suspect and even witnessed him using the computer to log into the mentioned websites, if another person had used the same computer, he/she should have been sighted by that same team.

OPTION C INCORRECT
The detective clearly stated that the suspect is either a hacker who is using a virus to shut down website X and Y or an unwitting user infected with the virus, so the argument isn't flawed because the detective didn't confuse either of this people.

OPTION D INCORRECT
The pattern is connected due to the fact that it was the same virus that affected both websites; this isn't a flaw to the argument because it is true and also serves as evidence.

OPTION E CORRECT
This is the only logical reason to why the detective's argument can be flawed. It is very much possible that other people also logged into the website the same time that the suspect did, and poses a serious flaw to the detective's argument because the detective focuses on just a person without entertaining the possibility that there are other suspects who might have spread the virus.
Join the discussion