BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

companyÂ’s chief executive

Expert replies
by gmatmachoman » Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:30 am
The companyÂ’s chief executive, whose technological expertise,
views on the future of the industry, and decision-making style
were impressive to the managers who worked with her, was also
acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside
her Â…rm, including executives at rival companies, whose
approaches often di¤ered substantially from
her own.


(A) were impressive to the managers who worked with her,
was also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many
people outside her Â…rm, including executives at rival
companies, whose approaches often di¤ered substantially
from

(B) impressed the managers who worked with her, also was
acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people
outside her Â…rm, including executives at rival companies,
whose approaches often di¤ered substantially from

(C) was impressive to the managers who worked with her, was
also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people
outside her Â…rm, that included executives at rival
companies, whose approaches were di¤erent substantially
in comparison to

(D) was impressive to the managers who worked with her, also
acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people
outside her Â…rm, who included executives at rival
companies, the approaches of whom di¤ered substantially
when compared to

(E) were an impression to the managers who worked with her,
also was acknowledged as a leading strategist by many
people outside her Â…rm, including executives at rival
companies, whose approaches were often substantially
di¤erent from that of
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by martin.jonson007 » Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:38 am
Join the discussion

by paes » Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:59 am
A is looking better.

But last part of the sentence
whose approaches often di¤ered substantially from her own.

is doing a wrong comparison.

E looks like to correct this mistake.
But E has many other ugly things/

OA Please.
Join the discussion

by nikhilkatira » Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:39 am
+1 fro A
Best,
Nikhil H. Katira
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:40 am
gmatmachoman wrote:The companyÂ’s chief executive, whose technological expertise,
views on the future of the industry, and decision-making style
were impressive to the managers who worked with her, was also
acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people outside
her Â…rm, including executives at rival companies, whose
approaches often di¤ered substantially from
her own.


(A) were impressive to the managers who worked with her,
was also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many
people outside her Â…rm, including executives at rival
companies, whose approaches often di¤ered substantially
from

(B) impressed the managers who worked with her, also was
acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people
outside her Â…rm, including executives at rival companies,
whose approaches often di¤ered substantially from

(C) was impressive to the managers who worked with her, was
also acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people
outside her Â…rm, that included executives at rival
companies, whose approaches were di¤erent substantially
in comparison to

(D) was impressive to the managers who worked with her, also
acknowledged as a leading strategist by many people
outside her Â…rm, who included executives at rival
companies, the approaches of whom di¤ered substantially
when compared to

(E) were an impression to the managers who worked with her,
also was acknowledged as a leading strategist by many
people outside her Â…rm, including executives at rival
companies, whose approaches were often substantially
di¤erent from that of
It is A

B and E can be eliminated becoz of the position of ALSO

D completely wrong in meaning....as if the executive acknowledged..

C ......list is there so we need WERE.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1