-
thp510
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:35 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
- Followed by:1 members
The gist of Ron's strategy from an old Thursday's With Ron Session on how to solve combinatorics problems 03DEC09 (https://www.manhattangmat.com/thursdays-with-ron.cfm):
1) Mark out the number of slots for each decision you have to make
2) Fill in each slot with the number of options
3) Multiply
*4) If order doesn't matter, take the number(s) of items where order doesn't matter and divide by it's factorial.
Question:
Greg, Marcia, Peter, Jan, Bobby, and Cindy go to a movie and sit next to each other in 6 adjacent seats in the front row of the theater. If Marcia and Jan will not sit next to each other, in how many different arrangements can the six people sit?
1) _ _ _ _ _ _ (six slots for the six seats)
2) 2 4 4 3 2 1 (The first "2" represents either Jan or Marcia, the first "4" represents Greg, Peter, Bobby and Cindy since they are the only ones that can sit next to either Jan or Marcia, the third "4" represents the four that are remaining after the first two sit down, etc, etc).
3) Multiply: 192
4) Does order matter here? Yes, this is an arrangement. So we stop. IMO: 192.
However, OA is 480. Why is my math wrong? I thought I followed Ron's method correctly? [/b]
1) Mark out the number of slots for each decision you have to make
2) Fill in each slot with the number of options
3) Multiply
*4) If order doesn't matter, take the number(s) of items where order doesn't matter and divide by it's factorial.
Question:
Greg, Marcia, Peter, Jan, Bobby, and Cindy go to a movie and sit next to each other in 6 adjacent seats in the front row of the theater. If Marcia and Jan will not sit next to each other, in how many different arrangements can the six people sit?
1) _ _ _ _ _ _ (six slots for the six seats)
2) 2 4 4 3 2 1 (The first "2" represents either Jan or Marcia, the first "4" represents Greg, Peter, Bobby and Cindy since they are the only ones that can sit next to either Jan or Marcia, the third "4" represents the four that are remaining after the first two sit down, etc, etc).
3) Multiply: 192
4) Does order matter here? Yes, this is an arrangement. So we stop. IMO: 192.
However, OA is 480. Why is my math wrong? I thought I followed Ron's method correctly? [/b]












