BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Combinatorics- 600-700 level

Expert replies
by lavinia » Fri Oct 01, 2010 6:03 am
How many different 5-person teams can be formed from a group of x individuals?

(1) If there had been x + 2 individuals in the group, exactly 126 different 5-person teams could have been formed.

(2) If there had been x + 1 individuals in the group, exactly 56 different 3-person teams could have been formed.

A Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C Both statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER one ALONE is sufficient.
D EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kmittal82 » Fri Oct 01, 2010 6:32 am
>How many different 5-person teams can be formed from a group of x individuals?

= x!/[5!*(x-5)!]. If we find x, we can calculate this

>(1) If there had been x + 2 individuals in the group, exactly 126 different 5-person teams could have been formed.

(x+2)!/[5!*(x-3)!] = 126

(x+2)(x+1)x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)!
---------------------------------- = 126
5! * (x-3)!

=> (x+2)(x+1)x(x-1)(x-2) = 126 x 5!

This equation will have more than 1 root, so insufficient.

>(2) If there had been x + 1 individuals in the group, exactly 56 different 3-person teams could have been formed.

(x+1)!/[3!(x-2)!] = 56

(x+1)x(x-1)(x-2)!
--------------------- = 56
3! * (x-2)!

x(x+1)(x-1) = 56x3x2 = 336

x = 7 is the only solution for this, so (B) is sufficient
Join the discussion

by kmittal82 » Fri Oct 01, 2010 6:40 am
I just rechecked using a calculator, and x= 7 is also a solution for equation 1, but how can we possibly know that by just looking at the equation?
Join the discussion

by lavinia » Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:16 am
The answer choice is D I'm still waiting for an explanation. Thanks kmittal82.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:42 am
lavinia wrote:How many different 5-person teams can be formed from a group of x individuals?

(1) If there had been x + 2 individuals in the group, exactly 126 different 5-person teams could have been formed.

(2) If there had been x + 1 individuals in the group, exactly 56 different 3-person teams could have been formed.

A Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C Both statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER one ALONE is sufficient.
D EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Total number of possible combinations = (the product of descending consecutive integers)/(number of elements being chosen)!

For example, the number of 4-member groups that can be made from 6 individuals = 6C4 = 6*5*4*3/4! = 15.

The number of integers in the numerator will be the same as the number of elements being chosen. The total number of individuals will be the largest of the descending consecutive integers in the numerator.

In the scenario above, we have 4 elements in our combination, so there are 4 descending consecutive integers in the numerator. The largest of the consecutive integers (6) = the total number of individuals.

Now let's tackle the DS question above. Let P = the product of the descending consecutive integers in the numerator.

Statement 1:
P/5! = 126
P = 126 * 5! = (9*7*2)*(5*4*3*2*1)
P = 9*8*7*6*5
Thus, if we have 9 people, we can form (9*8*7*6*5)/5! = 126 groups.
So x+2=9, and x=7.
Sufficient.

Statement 2:
P/3! = 56
P = (8*7)*(3*2*1)
P = 8*7*6
Thus, if we have 8 people, we can from 8*7*6/3! = 56 groups.
So x+1=8, and x=7.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by lavinia » Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:47 pm
Wow it's a great explanation. Now it makes sense.

Thank you GmatGuruNY!
Join the discussion

by lavinia » Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:32 am
I still have a question regarding this problem. Did you apply this formula: N!/ K!(N-K)!?


GMATGuruNY wrote:
lavinia wrote:How many different 5-person teams can be formed from a group of x individuals?

(1) If there had been x + 2 individuals in the group, exactly 126 different 5-person teams could have been formed.

(2) If there had been x + 1 individuals in the group, exactly 56 different 3-person teams could have been formed.

A Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C Both statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER one ALONE is sufficient.
D EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Total number of possible combinations = (the product of descending consecutive integers)/(number of elements being chosen)!

For example, the number of 4-member groups that can be made from 6 individuals = 6C4 = 6*5*4*3/4! = 15.

The number of integers in the numerator will be the same as the number of elements being chosen. The total number of individuals will be the largest of the descending consecutive integers in the numerator.

In the scenario above, we have 4 elements in our combination, so there are 4 descending consecutive integers in the numerator. The largest of the consecutive integers (6) = the total number of individuals.

Now let's tackle the DS question above. Let P = the product of the descending consecutive integers in the numerator.

Statement 1:
P/5! = 126
P = 126 * 5! = (9*7*2)*(5*4*3*2*1)
P = 9*8*7*6*5
Thus, if we have 9 people, we can form (9*8*7*6*5)/5! = 126 groups.
So x+2=9, and x=7.
Sufficient.

Statement 2:
P/3! = 56
P = (8*7)*(3*2*1)
P = 8*7*6
Thus, if we have 8 people, we can from 8*7*6/3! = 56 groups.
So x+1=8, and x=7.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is D.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:11 am
lavinia wrote:I still have a question regarding this problem. Did you apply this formula: N!/ K!(N-K)!?


GMATGuruNY wrote:
lavinia wrote:How many different 5-person teams can be formed from a group of x individuals?

(1) If there had been x + 2 individuals in the group, exactly 126 different 5-person teams could have been formed.

(2) If there had been x + 1 individuals in the group, exactly 56 different 3-person teams could have been formed.

A Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C Both statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER one ALONE is sufficient.
D EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Total number of possible combinations = (the product of descending consecutive integers)/(number of elements being chosen)!

For example, the number of 4-member groups that can be made from 6 individuals = 6C4 = 6*5*4*3/4! = 15.

The number of integers in the numerator will be the same as the number of elements being chosen. The total number of individuals will be the largest of the descending consecutive integers in the numerator.

In the scenario above, we have 4 elements in our combination, so there are 4 descending consecutive integers in the numerator. The largest of the consecutive integers (6) = the total number of individuals.

Now let's tackle the DS question above. Let P = the product of the descending consecutive integers in the numerator.

Statement 1:
P/5! = 126
P = 126 * 5! = (9*7*2)*(5*4*3*2*1)
P = 9*8*7*6*5
Thus, if we have 9 people, we can form (9*8*7*6*5)/5! = 126 groups.
So x+2=9, and x=7.
Sufficient.

Statement 2:
P/3! = 56
P = (8*7)*(3*2*1)
P = 8*7*6
Thus, if we have 8 people, we can from 8*7*6/3! = 56 groups.
So x+1=8, and x=7.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is D.
I had the formula in mind but found it easier to solve as I did above. Applying the combinations formula to statement 1, we'd get:

N!/(5!(N-5)!)= 126
N!/(N-5)! = 126 * 5! = 9*7*2*5*4*3*2*1 = 9*8*7*6*5
9!/4! = 9*8*7*6*5
N=9
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by lavinia » Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:52 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
lavinia wrote:I still have a question regarding this problem. Did you apply this formula: N!/ K!(N-K)!?


GMATGuruNY wrote:
lavinia wrote:How many different 5-person teams can be formed from a group of x individuals?

(1) If there had been x + 2 individuals in the group, exactly 126 different 5-person teams could have been formed.

(2) If there had been x + 1 individuals in the group, exactly 56 different 3-person teams could have been formed.

A Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C Both statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER one ALONE is sufficient.
D EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Total number of possible combinations = (the product of descending consecutive integers)/(number of elements being chosen)!

For example, the number of 4-member groups that can be made from 6 individuals = 6C4 = 6*5*4*3/4! = 15.

The number of integers in the numerator will be the same as the number of elements being chosen. The total number of individuals will be the largest of the descending consecutive integers in the numerator.

In the scenario above, we have 4 elements in our combination, so there are 4 descending consecutive integers in the numerator. The largest of the consecutive integers (6) = the total number of individuals.

Now let's tackle the DS question above. Let P = the product of the descending consecutive integers in the numerator.

Statement 1:
P/5! = 126
P = 126 * 5! = (9*7*2)*(5*4*3*2*1)
P = 9*8*7*6*5
Thus, if we have 9 people, we can form (9*8*7*6*5)/5! = 126 groups.
So x+2=9, and x=7.
Sufficient.

Statement 2:
P/3! = 56
P = (8*7)*(3*2*1)
P = 8*7*6
Thus, if we have 8 people, we can from 8*7*6/3! = 56 groups.
So x+1=8, and x=7.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is D.
I had the formula in mind but found it easier to solve as I did above. Applying the combinations formula to statement 1, we'd get:

N!/(5!(N-5)!)= 126
N!/(N-5)! = 126 * 5! = 9*7*2*5*4*3*2*1 = 9*8*7*6*5
9!/4! = 9*8*7*6*5
N=9
Thank you!
Join the discussion