BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Combinations Question

Expert replies
by TGE » Sun May 17, 2009 3:19 pm
Please see the problem below:

A committee of three people is to be chosen from four married couples. What is the number of different committees that can be chosen if two people who are married to each other cannot both serve on the committee?

(A) 16
(B) 24
(C) 26
(D) 30
(E) 32

OA: E

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cramya » Sun May 17, 2009 3:56 pm
Couples of ways:

First method

We need to choose 3 people

First person we hve 8 choices

For the 2nd person(out of 7 remaining) we have 6 choices (since one of them would make a couple with the first person already chosen)


For the 3rd person(out of 6remaining) we have 4 choices (since two of them would make a couple with the first person/second person already chosen) = 4

Since we have permuted above where the order is prevalent we need to divide by 3!

8*6*4 / 3! = 32


Second way:

8C3 is the number of ways we can choose 3 members from 8 members = 56

We can find the number of arrangements where the couple are together and then subtract this number from 56 to get to the number of arrangements without any couples

Lets say the couples are AB CD EF GH

Lets fix AB in a commitee.

We have 6 choices for the 3rd person. Since there are 4 married couples each couple pair will have 6 different committees including them

6*4 = 24

Number of committes withiut any couples = 56-24 = 32


Hope this helps!


Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by TGE » Sun May 17, 2009 4:13 pm
Pure genius. Thanks, cramya.
Join the discussion

by apple100 » Sun May 17, 2009 5:08 pm
cramya wrote:Couples of ways:

First method

We need to choose 3 people

First person we hve 8 choices

For the 2nd person(out of 7 remaining) we have 6 choices (since one of them would make a couple with the first person already chosen)


For the 3rd person(out of 6remaining) we have 4 choices (since two of them would make a couple with the first person/second person already chosen) = 4

Since we have permuted above where the order is prevalent we need to divide by 3!

8*6*4 / 3! = 32


Second way:

8C3 is the number of ways we can choose 3 members from 8 members = 56

We can find the number of arrangements where the couple are together and then subtract this number from 56 to get to the number of arrangements without any couples

Lets say the couples are AB CD EF GH

Lets fix AB in a commitee.

We have 6 choices for the 3rd person. Since there are 4 married couples each couple pair will have 6 different committees including them

6*4 = 24

Number of committes withiut any couples = 56-24 = 32


Hope this helps!


Regards,
CR
For the first method, can you explain why you divided by 3!

8*6*4 / 3! = 32
Join the discussion

by TGE » Sun May 17, 2009 6:04 pm
Apple100,

You divide by 3! since we don't care about the order, and there are 3! different ways (i.e., permutations) to arrange the 3 people. So you have to divide the number of permutations (i.e., 8 x 6 x 4) by 3! so that you count the arrangements of any 3 people only once.

Hope this helps. Anyone - please feel free to jump if I missed anything.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sun May 17, 2009 6:15 pm
U can analyze it coceptually or go by the definition

In a problem where the order of the elements is important and where the number of elements selected(R) is smaller than the list of items(N)

Total number of permutations (NpR)= N ! / (N-R) !

In a problem where the order of the elements is NOT important and where the number of elements selected(R) is smaller than the list of items(N)

Total number of combinations (NcR) = N ! / R! (N-R) !

In the problem above the order was not important since a commitee of ABC, CBA,CAB is all the same (i.e with three members A,B,C order not important)

Since there were 3 items selected (R) I divided by 3! (R!) (TO ELIMINATE ALL THE DUPLICATE COUNTS)

With ABC only 1 combination count possible but 6 different permutation count possible

8*6*4 would be 6 times the number of counts that would be applicable when the order is not important so I divide by 3! = 6



Hope this helps!


Regards,
CR
Join the discussion