DIAPERS

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 1 times

DIAPERS

by sogmat » Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:46 pm
Pedro: Unlike cloth diapers, disposable diapers are a threat to the environment. Sixteen billion disposable diapers are discarded annually, filling up landfills at an alarming rate. So people must stop buying disposable diapers and use cloth diapers.
Maria: But you forget that cloth diapers must be washed in hot water, which requires energy. Moreover, the resulting wastewater pollutes our rivers. When families use diaper services, diapers must be delivered by fuel-burning trucks that pollute the air and add to traffic congestion.
Maria objects to Pedro’s argument by
(A) claiming that Pedro overstates the negative evidence about disposable diapers in the course of his argument in favor of cloth diapers
(B) indicating that Pedro draws a hasty conclusion, based on inadequate evidence about cloth diapers
(C) pointing out that there is an ambiguous use of the word “disposable” in Pedro’s argument
(D) demonstrating that cloth diapers are a far more serious threat to the environment than disposable diapers are
(E) suggesting that the economic advantages of cloth diapers outweigh whatever environmental damage they may cause
OA B
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 211
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:17 pm
Thanked: 12 times
GMAT Score:680

by 4seasoncentre » Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:20 pm
I agree with the OA.

A) "Overstate" is too harsh a word. The evidence he stated is presumably accurate and Maria did not disagree with that evidence.
B) Pedro's argument is based entirely on evidence against disposable diapers. He mentioned nothing of cloth diapers, which implies he had inadequate information about them.
C) Maria mentions no such ambiguity. She doesn't disagree that you really do toss them out when done.
D) Maris doesn't claim that cloth diapers are more harmful- she just argues that they also have their flaws.
E) Economics are not discussed.

Also, who's ever heard of a cloth diaper laundry service? :lol:

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:47 pm
Agree with the OA:

A) claiming that Pedro overstates the negative evidence about disposable diapers in the course of his argument in favor of cloth diapers
he just makes a statement, doesnt overstate

(B) indicating that Pedro draws a hasty conclusion, based on inadequate evidence about cloth diapers
looks good

(C) pointing out that there is an ambiguous use of the word “disposable” in Pedro’s argument
no ambiguity in the use of 'disposable'

(D) demonstrating that cloth diapers are a far more serious threat to the environment than disposable diapers are
he is in favour of cloth diapers

(E) suggesting that the economic advantages of cloth diapers outweigh whatever environmental damage they may cause
out of scope.[/b]

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:00 am

by samanthaJ79 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:48 am
In my opinion D is the most logical one.