BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Clarifications needed

Expert replies
by gmatjeet » Thu Dec 30, 2010 6:49 pm
repeat question from past but re-posting because i cant understand this.

Question goes like this:

Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers. It increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year.
Which of the following statements, if true, would provide support for the author's claims above?
I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices.
II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4.
III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000.
(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) I and II only
(E) I, II, and III

People answered D.

I choose A. I totally disagree to III but have doubts on II. I will explain why.

Q says support author's claim.

Author's claim:

Policy increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year.

Now i doubt II because it talks about ethanol production. and ethanol is not food, it is SPIRIT.

Can someone clarify
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by David@VeritasPrep » Fri Dec 31, 2010 4:37 pm
This is actually a fact-based question dealing with the real world and some outside knowledge would be helpful here.

The situation in the United States currently is that the U.S. Congress has passed laws that subsidize the production of ethanol (which is a type of alcohol made from corn that is mixed with gasoline). Because the production of corn for ethanol means that less land is devoted to food crops, then the U.S. farmers sell fewer crops each year resulting in higher prices. In fact, the United Nations has called for the U.S. to end this practice since it is responsible for starvation in parts of Africa and even for increased rice prices around the world.

So the subsidy of ethanol is considered a farm subsidy and is directly responsibly for higher food prices since the corn is taken out of the food market. Also, the actual subsidies cost money to taxpayers.

So choice B (is assuming) and stating the above...

This is certainly not a type of question that I have ever seen on the GMAT and I think could use another round of editing to remove some assumptions!

Hope that helps!
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by gmat1011 » Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:40 pm
That is a good explanation.

But II offers no info about the quantum of costs, specifically that it is in "billions"

$1 subsidy costs $4 but what if the government only provides a $10 subsidy.... for the costs to run into billions and II to work one will have to assume subsidies are usually very large so that (times 4) - costs get close to "billions"

Strengthen questions always have a gray area - they rarely provide 100 pc support --- and for that reason I find them amongst the most challenging (for some reason I find weaken Qs slightly easier though they are conceptually the same in reverse order) ---- but specifically in this context aren't we assuming too much by thinking 'subsidies/benefits by their nature are very large' for II and thus option D to work? (real world knowledge we are not supposed t carry into the Q)

I... clearly has "billions" so there is no dispute about that one...
Join the discussion

by Tani » Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:07 am
Remember "Strengthen" means just that. The answer has to "strengthen" the argument, i.e. make it more likely to be correct, not "prove" it.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion