BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Charlesville Co. <600 CR>

Expert replies
by GmatKiss » Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:50 am
At the beginning of 1994, Congress enacted a 10% increase in the federal minimum wage. At that time, Charlesville Hotdog and Beef Company employed 4,000 employees, with over 90 percent of the workforce making minimum wage. Despite the fact that the increase in minimum wage increased the operating expenses of Charlesville Co., the company reported record profits at the end of 1994.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox?

A)Charlesville Co. spends more money procuring cows for their Hotdog and Beef products than they do paying their 4,000 workers.
B)Charlesville Co. also saw an increase in expenses other than its wages in 1994.
C)Before 1994, the company had considered giving its employees a 10% raise, but ultimately decided not to do so.
D)The company's customer base is made up primarily of families that rely on minimum wage incomes.
E)The majority of the company's 4,000 employees work in the company's meat-packing facilities.

OA after some discussion
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by badpoem » Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:29 am
IMO, (D).

A)Charlesville Co. spends more money procuring cows for their Hotdog and Beef products than they do paying their 4,000 workers. --> irrelevant on what their costs are from.

B)Charlesville Co. also saw an increase in expenses other than its wages in 1994. --> Again, increase in costs does not help resolve discrepancy.

C)Before 1994, the company had considered giving its employees a 10% raise, but ultimately decided not to do so --> considered, did not give. That does not explain the profits. At max, the situation could be such that there would be neither any profit nor any loss. That is not the case here.

D)The company's customer base is made up primarily of families that rely on minimum wage incomes --> the customer base consisted of Min. Wages people. Min. wage increased. So they spent at Charlesville.

E)The majority of the company's 4,000 employees work in the company's meat-packing facilities --> where people work does not help give any indication about profits.

Choice D is not the best of answers in general, because IMO, we have to make an assumption that the increase in min. wage actually went towards increased spending, but going by POE, it is the best of all choices.
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:30 am
Yep, D. D tells us that its own employee's are its customers. Especially the group whose wages were increased recently
Join the discussion