Celebrity & Community Service

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:12 pm

Celebrity & Community Service

by lilisanei » Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:35 pm
Famous personalities found guilty of many types of crimes in well-publicized trials are increasingly sentenced to the performance of community service, though unknown defendants convicted of similar crimes almost always serve prison sentences. However, the principle of equality before the law rules out using fame and publicity as relevant considerations in the sentencing of convicted criminals.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following conclusions?
A. The principle of equality before the law is rigorously applied in only a few types of criminal trials.
B. The number of convicted celebrities sentenced to community service should equal the number of convicted unknown defendants sentenced to community service.
C. The principle of equality before the law can properly be overridden by other principles in some cases.
D. The sentencing of celebrities to community service instead of prison constitutes a violation of the principle of equality before the law in many cases.
E. The principle of equality before the law does not allow for leniency in sentencing.


I think the correct answer is D, but I am not sure.

Please correct me, if it is wrong.

Thanks
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:27 am

by sundarashiv » Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:45 pm
I think its D as well..
1 Month ..Can I turn 640 - 720 ?

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:12 pm

by lilisanei » Wed Oct 13, 2010 12:48 pm
I have the same problem,
1 month and need to improve from 610 to at least 700.
I already lost two weeks of that!

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 3:20 pm

by sammoorai13 » Wed Oct 13, 2010 3:55 pm
IMO - D

And here are my reasoning/thoughts for each answer...

A - Principle only applied to a few trials, which mean it can be both celebrity and non celebrity trial - why is the sentence siding for celebrities??
B - Faulty Statement - why can't it be vice versa...
C - (had to think about this one) - But the "some cases" - means it can be applied to both celebrity and non celebrity (same as A)
D - Nothing wrong with it - Violates the principle.. yes.. pretty straight forward
E - Goes against the sentence - if it does not allow for leniency then why does it happen?