BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Carolyn & Jacob

Expert replies
by Gmat09_5ALL » Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:26 am
During a 10-week summer vacation, was the average (arithmetic mean) number of books that Carolyn read per week greater than the average number of books that Jacob
read per week?
(1) Twice the average number of books that Carolyn read per week was greater than 5 less than twice the average number of books that Jacob read per week.
(2) During the last 5 weeks of the vacation, Carolyn read a total of 3 books more than Jacob.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by dtweah » Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:20 am
Let C and J be their averages respectively for the 10 weeks.
Then the total number of books each reads for the 10 weak period is 10C and 10J respectively.

The question: Is C>J?
1) says 2C > 2J -5.
or C-J> -5/2. Since there are both negative and positive numbers > than -5/2 this is NOT SUFF. If C-J =-2,then J is greater. If C-J=2 then C is greater.

2) 5a-5b=3 where a and b are the averages of the last five weeks. This tells us that a>b. We need the average of the first five weeks for both and need to know whether one is greater than the other. We have to relate this info to stem to see whether we can figure out. Stem only gives us 10C and 10J where, C and J are 10 weak averages respectively.

So 10C-5a gives us the the total number of books Caro reads for first five weeks and 10J-5b gives number of books Jake reads for first 5 weeks. Lets find their respective averages

(10C-5a)/5=2C-a
10J-5b)/5=2J-b

call these e and f respectively

So 5e+5a=10C
5f +5b=10J

Subtracting second from first gives

5e -5f +(5a -5b) =10(C-J)
5e -5f +3 =10(C-J)

So 2 is not suff since we still have (C-J) as variable which is itself unknown.

Combining, we know C-J>-5/2, which cannot tell us whether e is greater or less than f. If C-J =-2, (which means C<J)RHS is negative, which in turn means f>e. If C-J = 2 (C>J) RHS is positive so e>f.

Choose E.
Join the discussion

by Gmat09_5ALL » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:11 am
Thanks dtweah, however OA for this is A
Join the discussion

by dtweah » Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:47 am
Gmat09_5ALL wrote:Thanks dtweah, however OA for this is A
By what reasoning? Do you have it?
Join the discussion

by abinas » Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:08 am
A doesn't look right to me.

A says 2C > 2J-5
take c = 20 and j =20 , it satisfies the above equation and the average # of books read is same.
if c=20 and j=21 then again the equation is true but the avg # of books read by c is less that books read by J. we can try another set of numbers c=21 and J=20, equation is still true and Avg # of books read by c is more than J.

IMO the answer should be E
Join the discussion

by fruti_yum » Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:55 pm
dtweah wrote:Let C and J be their averages respectively for the 10 weeks.
Then the total number of books each reads for the 10 weak period is 10C and 10J respectively.

The question: Is C>J?
1) says 2C > 2J -5.
or C-J> -5/2. Since there are both negative and positive numbers > than -5/2 this is NOT SUFF. If C-J =-2,then J is greater. If C-J=2 then C is greater.

2) 5a-5b=3 where a and b are the averages of the last five weeks. This tells us that a>b. We need the average of the first five weeks for both and need to know whether one is greater than the other. We have to relate this info to stem to see whether we can figure out. Stem only gives us 10C and 10J where, C and J are 10 weak averages respectively.

So 10C-5a gives us the the total number of books Caro reads for first five weeks and 10J-5b gives number of books Jake reads for first 5 weeks. Lets find their respective averages

(10C-5a)/5=2C-a
10J-5b)/5=2J-b

call these e and f respectively

So 5e+5a=10C
5f +5b=10J

Subtracting second from first gives

5e -5f +(5a -5b) =10(C-J)
5e -5f +3 =10(C-J)

So 2 is not suff since we still have (C-J) as variable which is itself unknown.

Combining, we know C-J>-5/2, which cannot tell us whether e is greater or less than f. If C-J =-2, (which means C<J)RHS is negative, which in turn means f>e. If C-J = 2 (C>J) RHS is positive so e>f.

Choose E.

OA is indeed correct..

the question is asking is avg books of caroline/week -avg books of jacob/ week > 0?

Statement 1 gives us exactly that...
2* avg caroline/week - 2 avg books of jacob/week >5

therefore avg caroline - avg jacob > 5 therefore if it's greater than 5 it's definitely > than 0

hth
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:44 am
am getting E as well. whats the source?
Join the discussion