BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

cards probability of pairs

Expert replies
by canuckclint » Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:51 pm
Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, there are 2 cards in the deck that have the same value.

Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value?


8/33


62/165


17/33


103/165


25/33
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by canuckclint » Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:56 pm
I think I solved it after thinking about it for awhile:

You can either get a pair with the 2nd, 3 or 4th card.

P(2) = 1/1 * 1/11
P(3) = 1/1 * 10/11 * 2/10
P(4) = 10/11 * 8/10 * 3/9


P(2) + P(3) + P(4) = 17/33


Let me know if there is a quicker strategy.
Join the discussion

by sudhir3127 » Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:05 pm
canuckclint wrote:I think I solved it after thinking about it for awhile:

You can either get a pair with the 2nd, 3 or 4th card.

P(2) = 1/1 * 1/11
P(3) = 1/1 * 10/11 * 2/10
P(4) = 10/11 * 8/10 * 3/9


P(2) + P(3) + P(4) = 17/33


Let me know if there is a quicker strategy.
the Quickest way would be

Atleast 1 = 1- None

1- p(0)
1- 10/11*8/10*6/9
= 17/33

hope that helps...
Join the discussion

by logitech » Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:22 pm
sudhir3127 wrote:
canuckclint wrote:I think I solved it after thinking about it for awhile:

You can either get a pair with the 2nd, 3 or 4th card.

P(2) = 1/1 * 1/11
P(3) = 1/1 * 10/11 * 2/10
P(4) = 10/11 * 8/10 * 3/9


P(2) + P(3) + P(4) = 17/33


Let me know if there is a quicker strategy.
the Quickest way would be

Atleast 1 = 1- None

1- p(0)
1- 10/11*8/10*6/9
= 17/33

hope that helps...
Beautiful minds....RESPECT! :!:

This question confused me because I found 17/33 as AT LEAST one PAIR probability , then I was trying to find out the probability of having TWO PAIRS and add them up...
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by logitech » Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:23 pm
canuckclint wrote:I think I solved it after thinking about it for awhile:

You can either get a pair with the 2nd, 3 or 4th card.

P(2) = 1/1 * 1/11
P(3) = 1/1 * 10/11 * 2/10
P(4) = 10/11 * 8/10 * 3/9


P(2) + P(3) + P(4) = 17/33


Let me know if there is a quicker strategy.
Great thinking canuckclint!

SO what would you say about having the second pair ?
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by canuckclint » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:23 pm
logitech wrote:
canuckclint wrote:I think I solved it after thinking about it for awhile:

You can either get a pair with the 2nd, 3 or 4th card.

P(2) = 1/1 * 1/11
P(3) = 1/1 * 10/11 * 2/10
P(4) = 10/11 * 8/10 * 3/9


P(2) + P(3) + P(4) = 17/33


Let me know if there is a quicker strategy.
Great thinking canuckclint!

SO what would you say about having the second pair ?
P(2) is simply the probabilty of not getting the 1st card as a pair 1/1
AND 2nd one as a pair. Since there is AND, you multiply.

P(3) = not getting 1st as pair, not getting 2nd as pair and getting 3rd as pair with 1st or 2nd. For the second card there are 11 cards left and you have to NOT get the same as 1st card: 10/11. Finally 3rd card, you
have 2/10 chances of getting a pair with the 1st or 2nd card.

Does that makes sense?


You get the idea.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:50 pm
canuckclint wrote:
logitech wrote:
canuckclint wrote:I think I solved it after thinking about it for awhile:

You can either get a pair with the 2nd, 3 or 4th card.

P(2) = 1/1 * 1/11
P(3) = 1/1 * 10/11 * 2/10
P(4) = 10/11 * 8/10 * 3/9


P(2) + P(3) + P(4) = 17/33


Let me know if there is a quicker strategy.
Great thinking canuckclint!

SO what would you say about having the second pair ?
P(2) is simply the probabilty of not getting the 1st card as a pair 1/1
AND 2nd one as a pair. Since there is AND, you multiply.

P(3) = not getting 1st as pair, not getting 2nd as pair and getting 3rd as pair with 1st or 2nd. For the second card there are 11 cards left and you have to NOT get the same as 1st card: 10/11. Finally 3rd card, you
have 2/10 chances of getting a pair with the 1st or 2nd card.

Does that makes sense?


You get the idea.
No I am clear on that. It sure does make sense too.

But the question is asking: " What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value? "

AT LEAST ONE PAIR means: We have to find P(one pair) + P(two pairs)

Or in other words for example:

You will either have

1 1 3 4 - ONE PAIR

OR

3 4 3 4 - TWO PAIR

Your solution is for having one pair ? Am I making any sense? :)
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by canuckclint » Fri Oct 31, 2008 8:11 pm
Logitech you are so right! Good stuff.
Here's the OA.



The chance of getting AT LEAST one pair of cards with the same value out of 4 dealt cards should be computed using the 1-x technique. That is, you should figure out the probability of getting NO PAIRS in those 4 cards (an easier probability to compute), and then subtract that probability from 1.

First card: The probability of getting NO pairs so far is 1 (since only one card has been dealt).

Second card: There is 1 card left in the deck with the same value as the first card. Thus, there are 10 cards that will NOT form a pair with the first card. We have 11 cards left in the deck.

Probability of NO pairs so far = 10/11.

Third card: Since we have gotten no pairs so far, we have two cards dealt with different values. There are 2 cards in the deck with the same values as those two cards. Thus, there are 8 cards that will not form a pair with either of those two cards. We have 10 cards left in the deck.

Probability of turning over a third card that does NOT form a pair in any way, GIVEN that we have NO pairs so far = 8/10.

Cumulative probability of avoiding a pair BOTH on the second card AND on the third card = product of the two probabilities above = (10/11) (8/10) = 8/11.

Fourth card: Now we have three cards dealt with different values. There are 3 cards in the deck with the same values; thus, there are 6 cards in the deck that will not form a pair with any of the three dealt cards. We have 9 cards left in the deck.

Probability of turning over a fourth card that does NOT form a pair in any way, GIVEN that we have NO pairs so far = 6/9.

Cumulative probability of avoiding a pair on the second card AND on the third card AND on the fourth card = cumulative product = (10/11) (8/10) (6/9) = 16/33.

Thus, the probability of getting AT LEAST ONE pair in the four cards is 1 - 16/33 = 17/33.

The correct answer is C.
Join the discussion

by canuckclint » Fri Oct 31, 2008 8:22 pm
It was just lucky for me to get the answer using my flawed logic!
I'll take it!
Join the discussion