• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Reach higher with Artificial Intelligence. Guaranteed
Now free for 30 days

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## Canned Tuna

tagged by:

This topic has 1 expert reply and 12 member replies
nervesofsteel Legendary Member
Joined
14 Aug 2008
Posted:
594 messages
12

#### Canned Tuna

Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:18 pm
A year ago, Dietz Foods launched a yearlong advertising campaign for its canned tuna. Last year Dietz sold 12 million cans
of tuna compared to the 10 million sold during the previous year, an increase directly attributable to new customers
brought in by the campaign. Profits from the additional sales, however, were substantially less than the cost of the
advertising campaign. Clearly, therefore, the campaign did nothing to further Dietz's economic interests.
92
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) Sales of canned tuna account for a relatively small percentage of Dietz Foods' profits.
(8) Most of the people who bought Dietz's canned tuna for the first time as a result of the campaign were already loyal
customers of other Dietz products. 3
(C) A less expensive advertising campaign would have brought in significantly fewer new customers for Dietz's canned
tuna than did the campaign Dietz Foods launched last year.
(D) Dietz made money on sales of canned tuna last year.
(E) In each of the past five years, there was a steep, industry-wide decline in sales of canned tuna.

singalong Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
09 Feb 2011
Posted:
95 messages
Followed by:
1 members
1
Sat Jan 14, 2012 7:24 pm
a little help here experts..

mankey Legendary Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Posted:
627 messages
Followed by:
1 members
4
Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:22 pm
Someone please provide OA for this one.

Thanks.

papgust Community Manager
Joined
10 Aug 2009
Posted:
1537 messages
Followed by:
240 members
653
Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:25 pm

If there is a steep decline in sales of canned tuna in each of the last 5 years, then the advertising campaign has very much helped the company to increase its sales and thereby enhancing economic interests of Dietz's food.

nervesofsteel Legendary Member
Joined
14 Aug 2008
Posted:
594 messages
12
Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:57 pm
papgust wrote:

If there is a steep decline in sales of canned tuna in each of the last 5 years, then the advertising campaign has very much helped the company to increase its sales and thereby enhancing economic interests of Dietz's food.
Why is C wrong...??

If a less expensive campaign would have brought less customers and we know that the increase in sale is due
to newly added customers.. then this campaign has helped ..!!

Thanks

papgust Community Manager
Joined
10 Aug 2009
Posted:
1537 messages
Followed by:
240 members
653
Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:17 pm
IMO C neither weakens nor strenghtens the argument. We are only looking to undermine the argument that campaign did nothing to further economic interests. We are not concerned whether a less expensive campaign would have brought in new customers or an expensive campaign would have brought in more new customers.

mehravikas Legendary Member
Joined
12 May 2008
Posted:
1161 messages
Followed by:
1 members
23
Test Date:
********
Target GMAT Score:
740
Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:32 pm
Agree. The answer should be E.

papgust wrote:
IMO C neither weakens nor strenghtens the argument. We are only looking to undermine the argument that campaign did nothing to further economic interests. We are not concerned whether a less expensive campaign would have brought in new customers or an expensive campaign would have brought in more new customers.

nervesofsteel Legendary Member
Joined
14 Aug 2008
Posted:
594 messages
12
Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:35 am
OA E

thanks all for sharing your point of view

kvcpk Legendary Member
Joined
30 May 2010
Posted:
1893 messages
Followed by:
6 members
215
Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:47 am
Sorry.. I am reopening this thread..

Can someone tell me why option A is wrong? There is no mention that canned tuna is the only product of deitz foods.

SmarpanGamt Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
08 Mar 2010
Posted:
203 messages
6
Test Date:
1.12.10
Target GMAT Score:
720
Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:00 am
kvcpk wrote:
Sorry.. I am reopening this thread..

Can someone tell me why option A is wrong? There is no mention that canned tuna is the only product of deitz foods.
The argument is on Campaign cost and econmonic of campaign cost t odirect sales. Other products will neither strength or weaken the argument.

singalong Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
09 Feb 2011
Posted:
95 messages
Followed by:
1 members
1
Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:07 am
But if the sales made were a part of the profits, which is apparently less, then wouldn't be the reason why the campaign didn't help in the process?

Joseph_Alexander Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
14 May 2014
Posted:
45 messages
1
Thu Nov 20, 2014 5:21 am
I was stuck between E and C here.

I eliminated E thinking that in the last 5 years (including the year in which 12MN (Yr 5 - and not Yr6) and 10MN (Yr 4) tins were sold) the industry was in a declining trend. So had the company not advertised so heavily in Yr 5, its sales would have been much lesser than 10MN tins, may be say 8MN tins (if the industry decline rate was 20%). Just because it advertised heavily it had 20% more sales than each of its competitors is the market. This certainly now is an economic benefit!

### Top Member

ardz24 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
22 Aug 2017
Posted:
426 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:34 am
Is letter A wrong?
I assume Dietz Foods also has other products..

### GMAT/MBA Expert

ErikaPrepScholar Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Posted:
473 messages
Followed by:
6 members
86
GMAT Score:
770
Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:36 am
We want to weaken the argument that the campaign did nothing to further Dietz's economic interests. In other words, we want to support the argument that the campaign did further Dietz's economic interests.

Answer choice A is out of scope. Looking at the passage, we see that the campaign was for Dietz's canned tuna, not for any of its other products. Whether or not Dietz sells additional products, this question is about how a canned tuna campaign improves canned tuna sales. If this statement is true, Dietz still paid more for the canned tuna campaign than it got in canned tuna sales. Maybe since Dietz has other products, it isn't as big of a loss, but it's still a loss.

Answer choice C is similar. A less expensive campaign may have brought in fewer customers. That doesn't change anything about the campaign Dietz actually ran! Even if the campaign earned Dietz more customers than a less expensive campaign would have, the gain from the new customers is still lower than what Dietz spent on the campaign. A less expensive campaign may have been even less successful, but the campaign that actually happened still lost Dietz money.

_________________

Erika John - Content Manager/Lead Instructor
https://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/

Get tutoring from me or another PrepScholar GMAT expert: https://gmat.prepscholar.com/gmat/s/tutoring/

Learn about our exclusive savings for BTG members (up to 25% off) and our 5 day free trial

Check out our PrepScholar GMAT YouTube channel, and read our expert guides on the PrepScholar GMAT blog

### Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 76 topics
2 LUANDATO 59 topics
3 ardz24 52 topics
4 AAPL 46 topics
5 M7MBA 45 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

141 posts
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

136 posts
3 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

134 posts
4 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

129 posts
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

110 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts