- reply2spg
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
- Thanked: 27 times
- GMAT Score:570
Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite, while each year sixteen buildings can be expected to sustain damage from such objects.
(A) one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite
(B) a human being should be struck by a meteorite once in every nine years
(C) a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years
(D) every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite
(E) every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite
OA D
Source OG 11
[spoiler]Can I tackle this question as a parallelism question. It is in following way.
I can easily eliminate A, B and C based on usage of 'should be'. However, between D and E, I changed the question as follows.
[/spoiler]
Canadian scientists have calculated that each year sixteen buildings can be expected to sustain and every nine years a human being will be struck Is this approach correct?
(A) one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite
(B) a human being should be struck by a meteorite once in every nine years
(C) a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years
(D) every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite
(E) every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite
OA D
Source OG 11
[spoiler]Can I tackle this question as a parallelism question. It is in following way.
I can easily eliminate A, B and C based on usage of 'should be'. However, between D and E, I changed the question as follows.
[/spoiler]
Canadian scientists have calculated that each year sixteen buildings can be expected to sustain and every nine years a human being will be struck Is this approach correct?
Last edited by reply2spg on Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)

















