BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Butterfly Rash

Expert replies
by komal » Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:04 pm
The doctor observed the butterfly rash on her patient's arm and the patient's evident fatigue, which was consistent with the symptoms of Lupus.

(A) which was consistent with the symptoms
(B) which were consistent with the symptoms
(C) that were consistent with those
(D) which symptoms were consistent with symptoms
(E) symptoms which were consistent with those

OA E
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by viidyasagar » Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:24 pm
The doctor observed the butterfly rash on her patient's arm and the patient's evident fatigue, which was consistent with the symptoms of Lupus.

(A) which was consistent with the symptoms
(B) which were consistent with the symptoms
(C) that were consistent with those
(D) which symptoms were consistent with symptoms
(E) symptoms which were consistent with those
I have underlined the suspect portion and i think the source of this problem is "Kaplan GMAT Advanced, 2009-10" edition.

I wish the OP had done this bit.

(A) which was consistent with the symptoms - if which refers to "observed" then which is too far hence ambiguous, if which refers to the symptoms then "which was" is not plural
(B) which were consistent with the symptoms - symptoms not mentioned before "which" hence it has no referent
(C) that were consistent with those - "those of" has no referent
(D) which symptoms were consistent with symptoms - absurd idiom error
(E) symptoms which were consistent with those - CORRECT, i thought a standalone "which" almost always follows a comma in the right answer. Here the comma precedes "symptoms". The word symptoms clears the pronoun gap and a comma post symptoms would make it an absurd appositive
Join the discussion

by fibbonnaci » Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:20 pm
Hey Komal, its ..... . I know it must have been a typo [ cant blame. after all we are used to url's everyday :P]

A) which was consistent with the symptoms ['which' here refers to fatigue and we are comparing fatigue to symptoms of lupus. wrong comparison.]

(B) which were consistent with the symptoms [same as A. Eliminated!]

(C) that were consistent with those ['that' again refers to fatigue alone. Eliminated!]

(D) which symptoms were consistent with symptoms [same error as in A. Eliminated!]

(E) symptoms which were consistent with those [correctly compares the symptoms to the sypmtoms of lupus. Correct!]

Hope this helps!
Join the discussion

by gauravgundal » Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:31 pm
Hi, I agree with E.

But I have one doubt that 'symptoms' word must be followed by comma because the 'which ..' part after it is a non-restrictive clause.

Komal ,Please check the sentence again if possible.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Feb 20, 2010 1:37 am
gauravgundal wrote:Hi, I agree with E.

But I have one doubt that 'symptoms' word must be followed by comma because the 'which ..' part after it is a non-restrictive clause.

Komal ,Please check the sentence again if possible.
Agreed. Comma is rquired before " when"

@Komal, plz chk th source...If u r typing it from the source,it may occur else if u Copy + Paste..???
Join the discussion

by viidyasagar » Sat Feb 20, 2010 1:44 am
IMHO "that" should replace "which" but definitely no comma after symptoms. Imagine having a comma after "symptoms".

The doctor observed the butterfly rash on her patient's arm and the patient's evident fatigue, symptoms, which were consistent with those of Lupus.

Ignore the word between commas and the sentence would read

The doctor observed the butterfly rash on her patient's arm and the patient's evident fatigue which were consistent with those of Lupus - WRONG...
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:31 am
viidyasagar wrote:IMHO "that" should replace "which" but definitely no comma after symptoms. Imagine having a comma after "symptoms".

The doctor observed the butterfly rash on her patient's arm and the patient's evident fatigue, symptoms, which were consistent with those of Lupus.

Ignore the word between commas and the sentence would read

The doctor observed the butterfly rash on her patient's arm and the patient's evident fatigue which were consistent with those of Lupus - WRONG...
Vidya,

I disagree ... chk OG 10 ...use "comma+ which" in search of the pdf file..u will see in all places that construction!!
Join the discussion

by komal » Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:12 am
fibbonnaci wrote:Hey Komal, its ..... . I know it must have been a typo [ cant blame. after all we are used to url's everyday :P]

lol sorry i clicked on 'url' option instead of 'underline'..... * Apologies * ....... SORRY FOR THE INCONVENIENCE EVERYONE
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1