BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Bunch of Xs

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:12 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: India
Thanked: 9 times

by austin » Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:17 am
If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x| < x

(2) |x| > x

Stem translation: -1<x<1????

1. |x| is always +ve. x can be positive or negative

x = 3; x/|x| = 3/3 = 1< x (=3); x lies away from -1 and 1
x = -1/2; x/|x| = (-1/2)/(1/2) = -1< x (=-1/2); x lies between -1 and 1
INCONSISTENT

2. x = -3
|-3|>-3; x lies way from -1 and 1
x = -1/2
|-1/2| > -1/2; x lies between -1 and 1

Combining,

x/|x| < x and |x| > x, x has to be negative and x has to lie between 1 and -1.

x = -1/2; x/|x| = (-1/2)/(1/2) = -1< x (=-1/2); x lies between -1 and 1
x = -1/2; |-1/2| > -1/2; x lies between -1 and 1

x = -3/4; x/|x| = (-3/4)/(3/4) = -1< x (=-3/4); x lies between -1 and 1
x = -3/4; |-3/4| > -3/4; x lies between -1 and 1
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:16 pm
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 11 times

by jimmiejaz » Fri Nov 28, 2008 4:39 am
One more approach.
we have to find Is |x| < 1?

from 1 we have
x/|x| < x
If x>0, |x| = x
x/x < x or x>1
If x<0, |x| = -x
x/-x<x or x>-1, but we taken x<0 so, limit is -1<x<0

But still we get either x>1 or -1<x<0 hence insuff..

From 2 we have
|x|>x which is only possible if x is negative.
this eqn gives us the range x<0. But x can be -1,-2....... -1000 and so on.
Hence insuff.

Combining we get the range as -1<x<0
Hence suff.
C.
What if i have not yet beat the beast, I know i will beat it!!!!!!!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 33 times

by vittalgmat » Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:16 pm
Here is my approach,
can somebody let know if this is correct.

Stmt 1: x/|x| < x
Since |x| is always positive, we can cross multiply without affecting the sign.
So we get
x < x * |x|

**Not sure of this step***
1 < |x|
ie |x| > 1

case 1: x is +ve
x > 1
case 2: x is -ve
-x > 1
x < -1

So x >1 or x < -1 ----------(1)
Not sufficient.


Stmt 2:
|x| > x
Ths is possible only if x is -ve.

not sufficient.

Combining,
x < -1

So any -ve number < -1 ie -2, ... -infinity will suffice.

So to answer the question |x| < 1, plug in -ve number less than 1 and see the result.
|-2| = 2 NOT < 1.. This is true for all negative numbers.

So sufficient.
ans is C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 amFollowed by: 355 members
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:51 pm
vittalgmat wrote:
So we get
x < x * |x|

**Not sure of this step***
1 < |x|
ie |x| > 1
Yes, that last step isn't quite right. You arrived correctly at the inequality:

x < x*|x|

but you then divided by x on both sides. You can't do that, because you don't know if x is positive or negative; if x is negative, you'd need to reverse the inequality. We can divide by x as long as we split the inequality into two cases:

1 < |x| if x is positive (so if x is positive, x must be greater than 1)
1 > |x| if x is negative (so if x is negative, x must be between 0 and -1)

So this statement is insufficient: |x| could be less than 1 if x is negative, and could be greater than 1 if x is positive. Since statement 2 guarantees that x is negative, the two statements together are sufficient, and give a 'yes' answer to the question.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1