BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

BTG-CR

Expert replies
by ankurmit » Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:30 am
Merger Analyst: Two long-time competitors, manufacturers of personal digital assistants- better known simply as PDAs-have agreed to merge their companies. The main purpose of the merger, put forth by outside analysts, would be to collaborate on the development of a PDA redesign that will allow the new merged company to manufacture PDAs at a lower cost.

Although the post-merger retail price, to be agreed on by the companies, will likely cut into the new company's overall profit margins, it will also eliminate the competition between these companies, two of the world's largest PDA manufacturers.


Given the above, which of the following statements, if true, as made by the president of one of the two companies, best illustrates the probable thinking behind the merger?

1 "By combining forces we will ensure that consumers pay the lowest possible cost for the next generation of Personal Digital Assistants."

2 We would rather secure relatively lower PDA profits than lose market share to a competitor."

3 Combining forces will be beneficial to the business climate in this country by setting a model of collaboration and goodwill as opposed to fostering the current competitive environment existing in the PDA industry."

4 "The best way to permanently lower the retail price of PDAs is to eliminate our most formidable competition."

5 "Although long-term PDA retail costs may rise, our next generation of PDAs will decrease in retail cost."


OA later
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by AIM GMAT » Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:59 am
IMO B .

Because the argument basically talks about the profit and competition. Very similar to an OG question .
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:32 am
A) Supporting analyst's assumption
B) Supporting the second paragraph post the word 'will'
'cut into the new company’s overall profit margins, it will also eliminate the competition between these companies'
C) They are not merging for goodwill ... they want money and market share
D) extreme
E)Dont care what happens in long term.. our analysis is about merger


For me it is between A& B
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:09 am
I am also confused between A and B.

Can anyone explain
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

by AIM GMAT » Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:15 am
In my opinion A talk about the consumers which is not the prime agenda of merger .

Although the post-merger retail price, to be agreed on by the companies, will likely cut into the new company’s overall profit margins, it will also eliminate the competition between these companies, two of the world’s largest PDA manufacturers.

The main purpose of the merger, put forth by outside analysts, would be to collaborate on the development of a PDA redesign that will allow the new merged company to manufacture PDAs at a lower cost.

But is it mentioned that lower cost is required for sake of consumers ? No , but profit margin and competetion is explicitly mentioned , so B is better option.

Anyways whats the OA ?
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:58 pm
But in argument it is mentioned that this merger will reduce competition between two merging companies.

It is not mentioned that it will help merging companies to face competition efficiently with other market players.
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:26 am
IMO B.

2 We would rather secure relatively lower PDA profits than lose market share to a competitor."

This appears to be the correct choice as it talks about competion and lowering the price of PDA. This gives both the companies an advantage of cutting competiotion while securing their profits.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:28 am
Why B?

The stimulus talks abt competion between the 2 big manufactures and not with respect to any third manufacturer .Nowhere in the stimulus is there anything mentioned about a third manufacturer
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:33 am
The idea behind 'cutting the competition' is competition between the two companies if they were not merged with each other.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:31 am
The line it
will also eliminate the competition between these companies, two of the world's largest PDA manufacturers.
is specific to these companies and not applicable in general to all companies.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:36 pm
ankurmit wrote:Merger Analyst: Two long-time competitors, manufacturers of personal digital assistants- better known simply as PDAs-have agreed to merge their companies. The main purpose of the merger, put forth by outside analysts, would be to collaborate on the development of a PDA redesign that will allow the new merged company to manufacture PDAs at a lower cost.

Although the post-merger retail price, to be agreed on by the companies, will likely cut into the new company's overall profit margins, it will also eliminate the competition between these companies, two of the world's largest PDA manufacturers.


Given the above, which of the following statements, if true, as made by the president of one of the two companies, best illustrates the probable thinking behind the merger?

1 "By combining forces we will ensure that consumers pay the lowest possible cost for the next generation of Personal Digital Assistants." - lowest possible cost- no where does the argument say tht the new retail price would be the lowest one. it may well be tht thr is a 3rd company which offers lowest price though the quality is not good. Competitors are compnies who are at the same level in temrs of price,quality etc. so we are only talking abt the price, profit and merger betwen competitors A and B. cant imply the new retail price calls for the lowest of all.
2 We would rather secure relatively lower PDA profits than lose market share to a competitor."

3 Combining forces will be beneficial to the business climate in this country by setting a model of collaboration and goodwill as opposed to fostering the current competitive environment existing in the PDA industry."

4 "The best way to permanently lower the retail price of PDAs is to eliminate our most formidable competition."

5 "Although long-term PDA retail costs may rise, our next generation of PDAs will decrease in retail cost."


OA later
B in my view. whs the OA and OE?
Join the discussion

by newton9 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:33 pm
P : Competitors have decided to merge to work together on PDA re-design. PDA's can be manfactured at a lower cost. Profit margin is going to reduce, but it will eliminate competition between two largest manufacturers.

A) This looks logical to me. The main purpose of the merger is to collaborate on the development of PDA to manufacture PDA's at a lower cost. So combining forces will ensure that customers will pay lowest cost for next generation of PDA's.

B) Argument doesn't talk about loosing the market share to competitors.

C) Seems a bit extreme -- beneficial to business climate in the country etc...

D) This is not supported by information in the passage. We don't know if this is the best way to permanently lower the price.

E) Stretch.

I am going with A. Please suggest any solid explanation for B.
Join the discussion