BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

need help understanding this question

Expert replies
by rtaha2412 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:06 pm
Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of sites damaged by toxic chemicals permits compensating state governments for damage to their natural resources but does not allow claims for injury to people.

(A) compensating state governments for damage to
(B) compensating state governments for the damaging of
(C) giving state governments compensation for damaging
(D) giving compensation to state governments for the damage of
(E) the giving of compensation to state governments for damaging
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by cyrwr1 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 3:30 pm
I'm going with A. Please let me know everyone's insight on this. Thanks
Join the discussion

by Target2009 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 3:44 pm
IMO - A
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:15 pm
IMO : A
Please advise OA
I think here damage to would be a correct idiom
Join the discussion

by eyelikecheese » Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:48 pm
A as well.


Compensating for is correct usage of the idiom

Parallelism in "for damage to their natural resources" and "for injury to people"
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:20 am
rtaha2412 wrote:Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of sites damaged by toxic chemicals permits compensating state governments for damage to their natural resources but does not allow claims for injury to people.

(A) compensating state governments for damage to
(B) compensating state governments for the damaging of
(C) giving state governments compensation for damaging
(D) giving compensation to state governments for the damage of
(E) the giving of compensation to state governments for damaging
I see this question focussing on parallelism and idioms.

I recognize the idiomatic structure permits x but Y.

Here X contains compensating and structure Y contains claims .. which are not parallel in comparison.

Thus, I pick D. Experts guidance and OA please.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Mon Jan 24, 2011 9:49 am
eyelikecheese wrote:A as well.


Compensating for is correct usage of the idiom

Parallelism in "for damage to their natural resources" and "for injury to people"
I'd have chosen A for these reasons as well as for concision.

Keep in mind that "compensating" here is a gerund -- a verbal noun -- and while not as similar-looking to "claims" as we might hope, it is still eligible for parallelism to a noun.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1