You are defying from your own logic.
Explain why Knewton's sentence is right.
You are simply restating what I stated "which cannot by logic modify people". similarly US by logic cannot be a pick up truck.
So you are self -contradicting and hence proving my argument.
This is an example from oxford dictionary :
relative pronoun & determiner
used referring to something previously mentioned when introducing a clause giving further information:
[as pronoun] :
a conference in Vienna which ended on Friday
Tell me what ended on friday? You will say Vienna but I will say conference.
Take any grammar book and it will tell you that which or any relative pronoun's verb depends on the antecedent of that pronoun.
Explain why Knewton's sentence is right.
You are simply restating what I stated "which cannot by logic modify people". similarly US by logic cannot be a pick up truck.
So you are self -contradicting and hence proving my argument.
This is an example from oxford dictionary :
relative pronoun & determiner
used referring to something previously mentioned when introducing a clause giving further information:
[as pronoun] :
a conference in Vienna which ended on Friday
Tell me what ended on friday? You will say Vienna but I will say conference.
Take any grammar book and it will tell you that which or any relative pronoun's verb depends on the antecedent of that pronoun.
