BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Veritas BF

Expert replies
by samyukta » Sat Aug 27, 2011 3:27 pm
During the past six months, a company in Dunwood has hired more union employees than it can afford to maintain. The company cannot fire union employees, so it cannot protect itself from financial disaster by cutting staff. Therefore, the company has offered to subsidize health club membership for employees who are willing to accept a small reduction in pay. Many employees will respond to this offer by accepting the reduction, since health club membership is often beyond their financial means. Thus, because employees who join health clubs will take fewer sick days than employees who do not join health clubs, the company will ultimately save a significant amount of money.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

The first and the second are both evidence offered by the argument as support for its main conclusion.


The first presents a problem a response to which the argument assesses; the second is the judgment reached by that assessment.


The first is the position the argument seeks to establish; the second is a judgment the argument uses to support that position.


The first is a development that the argument seeks to explain; the second is a prediction the argument makes in support of the explanation it offers.


The first presents a development whose likely outcome is at issue in the argument; the second is a judgment the argument uses in support of its conclusion about that outcome.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by thestartupguy » Sat Aug 27, 2011 3:57 pm
IMO B
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Sat Aug 27, 2011 4:18 pm
IMO B

The first and the second are both evidence offered by the argument as support for its main conclusion.


The first presents a problem a response to which the argument assesses; the second is the judgment reached by that assessment.


The first is the position the argument seeks to establish; the second is a judgment the argument uses to support that position. (argument seeks to provide alternative way curtail financial disaster)


The first is a development that the argument seeks to explain; the second is a prediction the argument makes in support of the explanation it offers. (Second boldface could be someone's prediction but definitely not what the argument predicts.)


The first presents a development whose likely outcome is at issue in the argument; the second is a judgment the argument uses in support of its conclusion about that outcome. (Not sure , if that's correct)
Smack is Back ...
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)
Join the discussion

by badpoem » Sat Aug 27, 2011 9:30 pm
The first and the second are both evidence offered by the argument as support for its main conclusion. --> the second is not an evidence or premise.


The first presents a problem a response to which the argument assesses; the second is the judgment reached by that assessment. --> keep. likely.


The first is the position the argument seeks to establish; the second is a judgment the argument uses to support that position. --. first is merely a statement or premise. reject.


The first is a development that the argument seeks to explain; the second is a prediction the argument makes in support of the explanation it offers. --> The second dos not exactly support the explanation.


The first presents a development whose likely outcome is at issue in the argument; the second is a judgment the argument uses in support of its conclusion about that outcome. --> The judgement does not support that outcome.


IMO (B).
Join the discussion

by crick » Sat Aug 27, 2011 9:46 pm
+1 for B.

Good question.

Crick
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:47 pm
Can someone post the OA please?
Smack is Back ...
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)
Join the discussion

by bblast » Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:19 am
Another good veritas CR. B looks pretty sweet. But there is something in E that makes me skeptical. But I think the judgement that E is talking about is these lines :

"Many employees will respond to this offer by accepting the reduction, since health club membership is often beyond their financial means"

So second part of E describes another part of the argument.
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:23 am
Was mixed with B,D and E
on second analysis, B won!

OA should be B
Join the discussion

by Carcass » Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:52 pm
First bold is premise FOR..........the second is the Conclusion.

B is the answer. OA ?? B 99% is
Join the discussion

by czarczar » Sun Aug 28, 2011 4:47 pm
Good CR.
IMO:B only.
Join the discussion

by navami » Mon Aug 29, 2011 7:05 am
IMO E ..
OA please
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Join the discussion

by killer1387 » Thu Sep 01, 2011 2:43 am
B +1

OA??
Join the discussion

by ColumbiaVC » Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:37 pm
Join the discussion

by navami » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:47 am
///OA/////
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Join the discussion