• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## Bluecorp tagged by: ##### This topic has 8 member replies ## Bluecorp Industry analysts feel that Bluecorp paid far too much to acquire rival Â…rm Strickland. While doing so limited competition they face in the marketplace, this approach cannot be proÂ…table in the long run. Once two rival Â…rms merge in order to increase proÂ…ts, the higher prices would only provide other competitors an opportunity to enter the Â…eld at a lower price, cutting into BluecorpÂ's proÂ…ts and making the acquisition of Strickland an expensive mistake. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) In some countries it is legal for two companies to merge even if the resulting entity would nearly monopolize the market. (B) The combination of Bluecorp and Strickland creates an entity whose size allows it to produce items at a far lower cost than could any smaller enterprise. (C) In addition to eliminating competition, BluecorpÂ's acquisition gives it a much more substantial presence in urban areas. (D) As a result of the acquisition, the new corporate entity will create two smaller entities to operate as independent suppliers to Bluecorp. (E) When two large companies in the same Â…eld combine, entrepreneurs tend to shy away from the Â…eld due to the single entityÂ's perceived dominance. Confuse between B and E GMAT Instructor Joined 17 Dec 2010 Posted: 1035 messages Followed by: 364 members Upvotes: 474 Hi Gasg, Here are my notes for this passage: -Conclusion: Bluecorp acquiring Strickland = NOT profitable long-term (author concedes it DID limit competition) -Evidence: Higher prices gives competitors opportunity -Assumption: That the merger = higher prices The question asks which answer choice would "weaken" the argument, so my prediction is something that shows the merger resulting in LOWER prices for Bluecorp. Let's look at the choices: (A) The legality of the merger is irrelevant to the argument (B) This correctly weakens the argument! "Lower cost" correctly refutes the "higher prices" in the assumption. (C) Bluecorp's presence in urban areas is irrelevant to the argument. (D) Independent suppliers are irrelevant to the argument. (E) The focus here is on the entrepreneurs "shying away" - it doesn't weaken the argument, which focuses on the merger = higher prices. You might like to check out this article I wrote recently on CR strategy: http://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2010/11/18/complete-the-passage-questions Hope that helps! -Vivian _________________ Vivian Kerr GMAT Rockstar, Tutor https://www.GMATrockstar.com https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at$150/hr. Contact: GMATrockstar@gmail.com

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!

Legendary Member
Joined
27 Dec 2008
Posted:
1337 messages
Followed by:
10 members
127
Test Date:
03/28/11

gasg wrote:
Industry analysts feel that Bluecorp paid far too much to acquire
rival Â…firm Strickland. While doing so limited competition they face
in the marketplace, this approach cannot be profiÂ…table in the long
run. Once two rival Â…firms merge in order to increase proÂ…ts, the
higher prices would only provide other competitors an opportunity
to enter the Â…field at a lower price, cutting into Bluecorp's proÂ…fits
and making the acquisition of Strickland an expensive mistake.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the
argument?
(A) In some countries it is legal for two companies to merge
even if the resulting entity would nearly monopolize the
market.
(B) The combination of Bluecorp and Strickland creates an
entity whose size allows it to produce items at a far lower
cost than could any smaller enterprise.
(C) In addition to eliminating competition, Bluecorp's
acquisition gives it a much more substantial presence
in urban areas.
(D) As a result of the acquisition, the new corporate entity
will create two smaller entities to operate as independent
suppliers to Bluecorp.
(E) When two large companies in the same Â…field combine,
entrepreneurs tend to shy away from the Â…field due to the
single entity's perceived dominance.

Confuse between B and E
I follow Vivian, and think answer B should be set as fort-post against the conclusion in passage.

@Vivian, checked your article featured under Grockit's at BTG. I would say sometimes question stem completes the passage; hence conclusion and related assumptions might be extended to question stem (this note is made only about the question stem, not answer choices).

Legendary Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Posted:
2330 messages
Followed by:
26 members
56
Hi Can u reaveal the source ?

Legendary Member
Joined
27 Dec 2008
Posted:
1337 messages
Followed by:
10 members
127
Test Date:
03/28/11
mundasingh123 wrote:
Hi Can u reaveal the source ?
I have exercised with this problem in GMAT-Hacks Total GMAT Verbal

Legendary Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Posted:
2330 messages
Followed by:
26 members
56
mundasingh123 wrote:
Hi Can u reaveal the source ?
I have exercised with this problem in GMAT-Hacks Total GMAT Verbal

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
05 Apr 2010
Posted:
160 messages
7
"... higher prices would only provide other competitors an opportunity to enter the Â…field at a lower price"

The passage just says "other competitors" without specifying 'smaller' or 'bigger'
B will not weaken if an entity larger than bluecorp or even the same size as bluecorp enters the field as b is restricted to "smaller enterprises"

E nips everything in the bud --- doesnt matter if the entity is larger or smaller -- no entrepreneur dares to even enter the field... This seems to me to be a much stronger weakening argument

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
06 Apr 2009
Posted:
199 messages
13
Conclusion of argument : Acquisition = long term profit is not a good idea because it leads to competition that helps to increase lower price products.

Reasons why answer choice E can be wrong:
1. argument doesn't say that two companies are large ones in the same field.
2. 'Tend' seems to be very light as compared with 'far lower cost' in answer choice B

Reason why I thought answer choice E can be a contender.
1. I will avoid competition

Please let me know if I am correct.

Legendary Member
Joined
03 Jun 2008
Posted:
502 messages
Followed by:
21 members
99
gauravgundal wrote:
Conclusion of argument : Acquisition = long term profit is not a good idea because it leads to competition that helps to increase lower price products.

Reasons why answer choice E can be wrong:
1. argument doesn't say that two companies are large ones in the same field.
2. 'Tend' seems to be very light as compared with 'far lower cost' in answer choice B

Reason why I thought answer choice E can be a contender.
1. I will avoid competition

Please let me know if I am correct.
Argument: Bluecorp and Strickland merger will not help increase the profits, as it allows the other competitors to enter the market at LOWER PRICES.

So, to weaken, you need to show that the merged firm CAN produce the items at lower cost (One more way to weaken the argument is show that there are no other competitors). B does exactly that.

E is not related to argument at all. Argument is about Bluecorp and Strickland merger, and the option E is a very generic statement, not affecting the argument.

_________________
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to $200 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Veritas GMAT Class Experience Lesson 1 Live Free Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Magoosh Study with Magoosh GMAT prep Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 1 Hour Free BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • FREE GMAT Exam Know how you'd score today for$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

### Top First Responders*

1 Ian Stewart 41 first replies
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow 40 first replies
3 Scott@TargetTestPrep 39 first replies
4 Jay@ManhattanReview 32 first replies
5 GMATGuruNY 26 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

159 posts
2 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

92 posts
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

60 posts
4 Ian Stewart

GMATiX Teacher

50 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

37 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts