BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

bill collection (pls explain)

Expert replies
by max37274 » Thu Feb 18, 2010 8:33 am
A company with long-outstanding bills owed by its customers can assign those bills to collection agency that pays the company a fraction of their amount and then tries to collect payment from the customers. Since these agencies pay companies only 15 percent of the total amount of the outstanding bills, a company interested in reducing losses from long-outstanding bills would be well advised to pursue its debtors on its own.

The argument depends on the assumption that

(A) a company that prusues its debtors on its own typically coliects more than 15 percent of the total amount of the long-outstanding bills that it is owed
(B) the cost to a company of pursuing its debtors on its own for payment of long-outstanding bills does not exceed 15 percent of the total amount of those bills
(C) collection agencies that are assigned bills for collection by companies are unsuccessful in collecting, on average, only 15 percent of the total amount of those bills.
(D) at least 15 percent of the coustomers that owe money to companies eventually pay their bills whether or not those bills are assigned to a collection agency
(E) unless most of the customers of a company pay their bills, that company in the long run will not be profitable.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by max37274 » Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:30 am
MODERATORS PLS HELP WHY A IS RIGHT AND B IS WRONG IN A ALSO there exists a possibility that costs are high and company incurs losses
Join the discussion

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:36 am
max37274 wrote:MODERATORS PLS HELP WHY A IS RIGHT AND B IS WRONG IN A ALSO there exists a possibility that costs are high and company incurs losses
B is wrong because if the total amount it would cost the company to pursue the debt on its own is not a neglegible cost, then the entire argument is wrong. Plus even if the cost is 15% it does not mean that the company could not obtain 50% of the debt and still net 35% more than they would have if they sold the debt to a collection agency.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.
Join the discussion

by komal » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:07 am
max37274 wrote:A company with long-outstanding bills owed by its customers can assign those bills to collection agency that pays the company a fraction of their amount and then tries to collect payment from the customers. Since these agencies pay companies only 15 percent of the total amount of the outstanding bills, a company interested in reducing losses from long-outstanding bills would be well advised to pursue its debtors on its own.

The argument depends on the assumption that

Assumption negation technique works very well for such question types.

(A) a company that prusues its debtors on its own typically coliects more than 15 percent of the total amount of the long-outstanding bills that it is owed
Correct : If we negate this answer choice (company does not collect more than 15% of total amt) the argument falls apart.

(B) the cost to a company of pursuing its debtors on its own for payment of long-outstanding bills does not exceed 15 percent of the total amount of those bills
Incorrect : Agencies pay only 15% to the companies. This indirectly means that it is costing the company 85% of the total amount of those bills. Thus if we negate (B) it only strengthens the argument.

(C) collection agencies that are assigned bills for collection by companies are unsuccessful in collecting, on average, only 15 percent of the total amount of those bills.
Incorrect : The assumption about the amount collected by agencies is not an issue here. The issue is total amt. collected by COMPANIES.

(D) at least 15 percent of the coustomers that owe money to companies eventually pay their bills whether or not those bills are assigned to a collection agency
Incorrect : If we logically negate this answer choice the argument does not weaken in any way. Hence Eliminated.

(E) unless most of the customers of a company pay their bills, that company in the long run will not be profitable.
Incorrect : Issue is not about 'long run profit'. It is about 'long o/s bills'. This is clearly a scope shift. Eliminated.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:27 am
@Max,

I suggest you to read thru the fundamentals of "Kaplan Denial Test/Negate test". This is a handy wonderful technique that could be used fo Assumption/ weaken based questions.

As Komal suggested, when we use denail test(Negate test), the assumptin on which the conclusion is based should certainly fall apart.

Assume "the assumption" to be concrete of a "building".So when u break down the concrete, the building has to fall apart.

If on any count even after theapplication of Denial Test, the conclusion is NOT shaky, then the selected option is NOT the assumption.

Using POE toanswer Assumption/Strengthe/Weaken based question is NOT a great idea.
As" Assumption " is a building block to the conclusion of the argument, use Denial test to check whethet the argument gets shaky or not!!

In additon, as always u can use Powerscore CR for building ur "building blocks".Practice is of less use unlsee u build it using "Stronger theoritical stuff"
Join the discussion

by okigbo » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:27 am
great question and answers..

I fell for B cuz it sounded like a 'gmat type' assumption answer.. very clearly A here

max, your CR's are very tricky and great practice...what's the source??
Join the discussion

by max37274 » Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:40 pm
Thanks Sirous, Komal and Machoman for excellent tips.
Join the discussion