BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Biking to work - Rates problem

Expert replies
by limits660 » Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:56 pm
Biking to Work

Deb normally drives to work in 45 minutes at an average speed of 40 miles per hour. This week, however, she plans to bike to work along a route that decreases the total distance she usually travels when driving by 20% . If Deb averages between 12 and 16 miles per hour when biking, how many minutes earlier will she need to leave in the morning in order to ensure she arrives at work at the same time as when she drives?

(A) 135
(B) 105
(C) 95
(D) 75
(E) 45

Hi guys, Manhattan GMAT posted this question but havent posted an answer in a long time. I 'think' I got the correct answer of D. Any one else getting this answer? Let me know :D
-
Jeff Sacco
www.jeffsacco.ca
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by ajith » Sun Oct 22, 2006 9:23 pm
Deb normally drives to work in 45 minutes at an average speed of 40 miles per hour. This week, however, she plans to bike to work along a route that decreases the total distance she usually travels when driving by 20% . If Deb averages between 12 and 16 miles per hour when biking, how many minutes earlier will she need to leave in the morning in order to ensure she arrives at work at the same time as when she drives?

(A) 135
(B) 105
(C) 95
(D) 75
(E) 45


Work place is 30 miles away (3/4*40) when Deb drives.
When Deb bikes the distance is 30*80/100 = 24 miles
If she travels at an average of 12 mph it will take 120 minutes
If she travels at an average of 16 mph it will take 90 minutes

For that to happen she will have to start between 75 and 45 minutes earlier than she used to. I dont know which answer is feasible as both D and E are seeming to be all right. Yet, since we dont want her to be late so to make sure that she reaches on time 75 is better, as it is always safe.
How muchever is her biking speed she reaches the office if she starts 75 mins earlier. ( worst case scenario??) ... Heh
Join the discussion

by rajs.kumar » Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:10 am
D it is. The question asks to ensure that Deb arrives on time, so we have to go for the worst case value like Ajith suggested.
Join the discussion