-
barrelbowl
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:34 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
Hey all,
Either I'm missing something here or there is an error in the following question. This was from CAT exam #4:
Is the positive integer N a perfect square?
(1) The number of distinct factors of N is even.
(2) The sum of all distinct factors of N is even.
The answer is D, both are sufficient.
I answered E, reason being -
If the integer was 3, then it would have an even number of factors (3 and 1). That goes for any prime number as well (i.e. 5 - 5 and 1). These numbers are not perfect squares, so (1) is insufficient.
For (2) using a prime number like 3 - 3+1 = 4 which is even. For a number the number 9 - the number of factors is also even (3+1 = 4). So N isn't necessarily a perfect square.
Are my definitions screwed up or is there something wrong with this question? Thanks in advance.
Either I'm missing something here or there is an error in the following question. This was from CAT exam #4:
Is the positive integer N a perfect square?
(1) The number of distinct factors of N is even.
(2) The sum of all distinct factors of N is even.
The answer is D, both are sufficient.
I answered E, reason being -
If the integer was 3, then it would have an even number of factors (3 and 1). That goes for any prime number as well (i.e. 5 - 5 and 1). These numbers are not perfect squares, so (1) is insufficient.
For (2) using a prime number like 3 - 3+1 = 4 which is even. For a number the number 9 - the number of factors is also even (3+1 = 4). So N isn't necessarily a perfect square.
Are my definitions screwed up or is there something wrong with this question? Thanks in advance.












