BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

In the United States proven oil reserves

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members

In the United States proven oil reserves

by BTGmoderatorDC » Fri Nov 17, 2017 5:10 am
In the United States proven oil reserves-the amount of oil considered extractable from known fields-are at the same level as they were ten years ago. Yet over this same period no new oil fields of any consequence have been discovered, and the annual consumption of domestically produced oil has increased.

Which one of the following, if true, best reconciles the discrepancy described above?

(A) Over the past decade the annual consumption of imported oil has increased more rapidly than that of domestic oil in the United States.
(B) Conservation measures have lowered the rate of growth of domestic oil consumption from what it was a decade ago.
(C) Oil exploration in the United States has slowed due to increased concern over the environmental impact of such exploration.
(D) The price of domestically produced oil has fallen substantially over the past decade.
(E) Due to technological advances over the last decade, much oil previously considered unextractable is now considered extractable.

How can i find the best Option?

OA E
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 555
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:18 pm
Thanked: 180 times
Followed by:12 members

by EconomistGMATTutor » Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:55 am
The discrepancy:
1) The amount of oil considered extractable from known fields is at the same level as it was ten years ago, and YET . . .
2) No new oil fields have been discovered, and the annual consumption of oil has increased.

We need to show that both of these two statements can be true. You might think that with no new oil fields and an increase in consumption, the amount of extractable oil would NOT be the same as it was ten years ago - it would be less.

Choice A: This makes an irrelevant comparison between imported and domestic oil consumption.
Choice B: This statement says that the growth rate of oil consumption has lowered, but this means that it's still growing. Again, you'd think that the amount of oil would be less than before.
Choice C: This refers to oil exploration, which is not directly relevant to the argument.
Choice D: Okay, the price has fallen. How does this impact oil consumption? The choice doesn't say, so it's not directly relevant to the discrepancy we're examining.
Choice E is correct. If you look at Statement 1 above, it says that the amount of extractable oil hasn't changed. This answer choice tells us that while it's true that there aren't more oil fields, and it's true that consumption has increased, it's also true that more of the existing oil can now be extracted due to technological improvements.

I'm available if you'd like to follow up on this question.
GMAT Prep From The Economist
We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee.
Our average student improves 98 points.

Image
Top
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members

by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:48 pm
EconomistGMATTutor wrote:The discrepancy:
1) The amount of oil considered extractable from known fields is at the same level as it was ten years ago, and YET . . .
2) No new oil fields have been discovered, and the annual consumption of oil has increased.

We need to show that both of these two statements can be true. You might think that with no new oil fields and an increase in consumption, the amount of extractable oil would NOT be the same as it was ten years ago - it would be less.

Choice A: This makes an irrelevant comparison between imported and domestic oil consumption.
Choice B: This statement says that the growth rate of oil consumption has lowered, but this means that it's still growing. Again, you'd think that the amount of oil would be less than before.
Choice C: This refers to oil exploration, which is not directly relevant to the argument.
Choice D: Okay, the price has fallen. How does this impact oil consumption? The choice doesn't say, so it's not directly relevant to the discrepancy we're examining.
Choice E is correct. If you look at Statement 1 above, it says that the amount of extractable oil hasn't changed. This answer choice tells us that while it's true that there aren't more oil fields, and it's true that consumption has increased, it's also true that more of the existing oil can now be extracted due to technological improvements.

I'm available if you'd like to follow up on this question.
Thanks a lot!
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1