• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## Between 1971 and 1975 ##### This topic has 1 expert reply and 1 member reply ### Top Member ## Between 1971 and 1975 Between 1971 and 1975, the government office that monitors drug companies issued an average of 60 citations a year for serious violations of drug-promotion laws. Between 1976 and 1980, the annual average for issuance of such citations was only 5. This decrease indicates that the government office was, on average, considerably more lax in enforcing drug-promotion laws between 1976 and 1980 than it was between 1971 and 1975. The argument assumes which one of the following? (A) The decrease in the number of citations was not caused by a decrease in drug companies violations of drug-promotion laws. (B) A change in enforcement of drug-promotion laws did not apply to minor violations. (C) The enforcement of drug-promotion laws changed in response to political pressure. (D) The government office should not issue more than an average of 5 citations a year to drug companies for serious violations of drug-promotion laws. (E) Before 1971 the government office issued more than 60 citations a year to drug companies for serious violations of drug-promotion laws. What is wrong with Options B & E? OA A ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 04 Oct 2017 Posted: 551 messages Followed by: 11 members Upvotes: 180 Top Reply The conclusion: The government office was more lax in enforcing drug-promotion laws between 1976 and 1980 than it was between 1971 and 1975. The evidence: Between 1971 and 1975, the government office issued an average of 60 citations a year, and between 1976 and 1980, the annual average for issuance of such citations was only 5. This argument clearly assumes that the reason for the drop from 60 to 5 citations was because the government was lax. Perhaps there was a different cause. For example, maybe there were simply fewer actual violations. This is what Choice A, the correct choice, takes care of. It says that the decrease was NOT because of a drop in actual violations. This strengthens the claim that, instead, the government was lax. You asked about Choices B and E. Choice B is irrelevant. It says that there was a change in the enforcement of drug-promotion laws without saying what that change was. Were the laws more strictly enforced? Less strictly? The fact that this change did not apply to minor violations doesn't matter either. Choice E is an "other" choice. Why does it matter that there were more than 60 citations a year prior to the period that is relevant to the argument. It doesn't. I'm available if you'd like to follow up on this question. _________________ GMAT Prep From The Economist We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee. Our average student improves 98 points. Free 7-Day Test Prep with Economist GMAT Tutor - Receive free access to the top-rated GMAT prep course including a 1-on-1 strategy session, 2 full-length tests, and 5 ask-a-tutor messages. Get started now. ### Top Member Moderator Joined 07 Sep 2017 Posted: 3164 messages Followed by: 8 members EconomistGMATTutor wrote: The conclusion: The government office was more lax in enforcing drug-promotion laws between 1976 and 1980 than it was between 1971 and 1975. The evidence: Between 1971 and 1975, the government office issued an average of 60 citations a year, and between 1976 and 1980, the annual average for issuance of such citations was only 5. This argument clearly assumes that the reason for the drop from 60 to 5 citations was because the government was lax. Perhaps there was a different cause. For example, maybe there were simply fewer actual violations. This is what Choice A, the correct choice, takes care of. It says that the decrease was NOT because of a drop in actual violations. This strengthens the claim that, instead, the government was lax. You asked about Choices B and E. Choice B is irrelevant. It says that there was a change in the enforcement of drug-promotion laws without saying what that change was. Were the laws more strictly enforced? Less strictly? The fact that this change did not apply to minor violations doesn't matter either. Choice E is an "other" choice. Why does it matter that there were more than 60 citations a year prior to the period that is relevant to the argument. It doesn't. I'm available if you'd like to follow up on this question. Thanks a lot! • 5-Day Free Trial 5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Magoosh Study with Magoosh GMAT prep Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 1 Hour Free BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Veritas GMAT Class Experience Lesson 1 Live Free Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Get 300+ Practice Questions 25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • FREE GMAT Exam Know how you'd score today for$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

### Top First Responders*

1 Ian Stewart 41 first replies
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow 40 first replies
3 Scott@TargetTestPrep 39 first replies
4 Jay@ManhattanReview 32 first replies
5 GMATGuruNY 26 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

159 posts
2 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

92 posts
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

60 posts
4 Ian Stewart

GMATiX Teacher

50 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

37 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts