BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Best Sentence correction anomaly

Expert replies
by magnus opus » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:50 am
53. There is no consensus on what role. if any, is played by acid rain in slowing the growth or damaging forests
in the eastern United States.
(A) slowing the growth or damaging
(B) the damage or the slowing of the growth of
(C) the damage to or the slowness of the growth of
(D) damaged or slowed growth of
(E) damaging or slowing the growth of

The correct answer is E.

however, since damaging and slowing are linked by "or" either verb can take the sentence that follows.
so, if the sentence is broken it can be read as:-

There is no consensus on what role,if any, is played by acid rain in damaging the growth of forests
in the eastern United States.

which is clearly illogical as growth is not tangible so it cant be damaged-though it can be hampered but thats not relevant here.

I also understand the correct parallelism
The sentence can be rephrased as,

what role is played by acid rain in damaging forests
what role is played by acid rain in slowing the growth of forests

Here parallelism is maintained properly and preposition "of" is needed.

-since the sentence can have two meanings hence the it is clearly ambiguous.

C on the other hand changes the intent slightly but is grammatically perfect.

If you have a logical explanation of why E is correct. please share.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by uwhusky » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:06 am
Is it me or does this post feel like a deja-vu post?
There is no consensus on what role,if any, is played by acid rain in damaging the growth of forests
in the eastern United States.
Above is actually an incorrect interpretation of the sentence. The correct interpretation can be broken down to:

There is no consensus on what role, if any, is played by acid rain in damaging forests in the eastern United States.

and

There is no consensus on what role, if any, is played by acid rain in slowing the growth of forests in the eastern United States.

I think most people would find "the slowness of the growth of forest" to be an awkward phrase and a signal that there must be a better answer.
Yep.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1