Law

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 1 times

Law

by sogmat » Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:25 pm
The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.
(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment

OA C
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: Law

by iamcste » Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:29 pm
sogmat wrote:The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.
(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment

OA C
well, errors are

1. minority hiring and eventually promoting= X and Y

X must be logically and grammatically parallel, which is certainly not the case. Hiring is a noun while promoting is just a participle.

Eliminate A and B

2. E is passive and wordy

Left with C and D
While I couldnt really find any major error I feel like going with C

In C, quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion..and is correctly used to join 2 statement related to a common subject

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:11 pm
Choice D uses the comma in an inapporpriate way.

Dont split a compound predicate i.e in the sentence above what an offer of a position did and did not do are closely related ideas.

Dont use a comma in this situation. Never use a comma to split a compound subject or a compound predicate

Hence C wins over D.

Hope I am not off here...

Regards,
CR

Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:12 pm
@iamcste
well, errors are

1. minority hiring and eventually promoting= X and Y

X must be logically and grammatically parallel, which is certainly not the case. Hiring is a noun while promoting is just a participle.

Eliminate A and B

2. E is passive and wordy
Between C and D

If you observe carefully...

Here we are talking about the "offer" of the firm...

In D, the clause "not reflecting..." modifies the word "quota".. We want something that modifies "offer" ...

C exactly does that by using proper conjunction.

thanks.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:14 pm
Well put, Raunek.

Regards,
CR

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

by iamcste » Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:04 pm
raunekk wrote:
In D, the clause "not reflecting..." modifies the word "quota".. We want something that modifies "offer" ...

C exactly does that by using proper conjunction.

thanks.
while I may be incorrect, I am not very sure that "not reflecting" modifies quota, I feel like its participal modifying subject of previous clause and not quota

• Page 1 of 1