BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The study of

Expert replies
by heymayank08 » Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:37 am
The study of foreign languages is finally
becoming a serious endeavor in U.S. education.
The number of American college students
enrolled in non-English language courses has
increased by 20 percent over the last five years.
Spanish, with over 500,000 students, is the
most popular; its enrollment has increased by
30 percent. Meanwhile, enrollment in Japanese
and Russian has nearly doubled, and now
comprises eight percent of total foreign language
study. Clearly there is now an increased interest
in foreign language study. When these students
join the work force, they will enhance not only
U.S. businesses' ability to compete internationally
but also our country's reputation abroad.
The answer to which of the following questions
would be LEAST relevant to evaluating the above
claims?
(A) Do students enrolled in foreign language
classes continue their studies long enough
to attain competence in those languages?
(B) By what percentage has overall enrollment
in U.S. colleges and universities increased
over the past five years?
(C) Does a significant number of students of
foreign languages go into professions in
which the ability to speak other languages
is useful?
(D) Has the study of "dead" languages like
Latin and Ancient Greek increased at a
similar rate to that of modern languages?
(E) How does the percentage increase in
foreign language enrollment over the past
five years compare to previous increases
in enrollment?


OA later :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by proudtobeindian » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:16 am
B. Should not matter the overall percentage of enrollments in US colleges and universities.
Join the discussion

by santhoshsram » Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:12 pm
IMO D
-- Santhosh S
Join the discussion

by scholardream » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:49 pm
Hi heymayank08, could you provide some comments on my work belw:
Premise 1: No. of Stud enrolled non-E language up 20%.
Premise 2: Spanish > 500k stud, up 30% = 8% Total
Premise 3: better foreign languages -> better compete & US reputation
Conclusion: an increased interest in FL study
Question: answer least relavent -> provide no information to support or weaken the conclusion
(A) If students don't study long enough -> not competent -> not useful -> no better compete & US reputation. It did provide infor to support the conclusion. -> eliminate
(B) If the percentage remains the same, the increase in enrolled Stud due to the increase in Number of Stud. -> Conclusion is weaken. If % increase -> Conclusion is support. -> eliminate
(C) If yes -> improve compete & US reputation. If no -> No improve. Answer of this question surely useful to judge the conclusion -> eliminate
(D) If yes or no, the answer to this question is not impact the conclusion. -> this is the answer
(E) The same reason as (B) -> eliminate

So my answer is (D)
Join the discussion

by heymayank08 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:13 am
scholardream wrote:Hi heymayank08, could you provide some comments on my work belw:
Premise 1: No. of Stud enrolled non-E language up 20%.
Premise 2: Spanish > 500k stud, up 30% = 8% Total
Premise 3: better foreign languages -> better compete & US reputation
Conclusion: an increased interest in FL study
Question: answer least relavent -> provide no information to support or weaken the conclusion
(A) If students don't study long enough -> not competent -> not useful -> no better compete & US reputation. It did provide infor to support the conclusion. -> eliminate
(B) If the percentage remains the same, the increase in enrolled Stud due to the increase in Number of Stud. -> Conclusion is weaken. If % increase -> Conclusion is support. -> eliminate
(C) If yes -> improve compete & US reputation. If no -> No improve. Answer of this question surely useful to judge the conclusion -> eliminate
(D) If yes or no, the answer to this question is not impact the conclusion. -> this is the answer
(E) The same reason as (B) -> eliminate

So my answer is (D)

[spoiler]yep
OA D[/spoiler]
Join the discussion