Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

The study of

Expert replies
by heymayank08 » Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:37 am
The study of foreign languages is finally
becoming a serious endeavor in U.S. education.
The number of American college students
enrolled in non-English language courses has
increased by 20 percent over the last five years.
Spanish, with over 500,000 students, is the
most popular; its enrollment has increased by
30 percent. Meanwhile, enrollment in Japanese
and Russian has nearly doubled, and now
comprises eight percent of total foreign language
study. Clearly there is now an increased interest
in foreign language study. When these students
join the work force, they will enhance not only
U.S. businesses’ ability to compete internationally
but also our country’s reputation abroad.
The answer to which of the following questions
would be LEAST relevant to evaluating the above
claims?
(A) Do students enrolled in foreign language
classes continue their studies long enough
to attain competence in those languages?
(B) By what percentage has overall enrollment
in U.S. colleges and universities increased
over the past five years?
(C) Does a significant number of students of
foreign languages go into professions in
which the ability to speak other languages
is useful?
(D) Has the study of “dead” languages like
Latin and Ancient Greek increased at a
similar rate to that of modern languages?
(E) How does the percentage increase in
foreign language enrollment over the past
five years compare to previous increases
in enrollment?


OA later :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by proudtobeindian » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:16 am
B. Should not matter the overall percentage of enrollments in US colleges and universities.
Join the discussion

by santhoshsram » Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:12 pm
IMO D
-- Santhosh S
Join the discussion

by scholardream » Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:49 pm
Hi heymayank08, could you provide some comments on my work belw:
Premise 1: No. of Stud enrolled non-E language up 20%.
Premise 2: Spanish > 500k stud, up 30% = 8% Total
Premise 3: better foreign languages -> better compete & US reputation
Conclusion: an increased interest in FL study
Question: answer least relavent -> provide no information to support or weaken the conclusion
(A) If students don't study long enough -> not competent -> not useful -> no better compete & US reputation. It did provide infor to support the conclusion. -> eliminate
(B) If the percentage remains the same, the increase in enrolled Stud due to the increase in Number of Stud. -> Conclusion is weaken. If % increase -> Conclusion is support. -> eliminate
(C) If yes -> improve compete & US reputation. If no -> No improve. Answer of this question surely useful to judge the conclusion -> eliminate
(D) If yes or no, the answer to this question is not impact the conclusion. -> this is the answer
(E) The same reason as (B) -> eliminate

So my answer is (D)
Join the discussion

by heymayank08 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:13 am
scholardream wrote:Hi heymayank08, could you provide some comments on my work belw:
Premise 1: No. of Stud enrolled non-E language up 20%.
Premise 2: Spanish > 500k stud, up 30% = 8% Total
Premise 3: better foreign languages -> better compete & US reputation
Conclusion: an increased interest in FL study
Question: answer least relavent -> provide no information to support or weaken the conclusion
(A) If students don't study long enough -> not competent -> not useful -> no better compete & US reputation. It did provide infor to support the conclusion. -> eliminate
(B) If the percentage remains the same, the increase in enrolled Stud due to the increase in Number of Stud. -> Conclusion is weaken. If % increase -> Conclusion is support. -> eliminate
(C) If yes -> improve compete & US reputation. If no -> No improve. Answer of this question surely useful to judge the conclusion -> eliminate
(D) If yes or no, the answer to this question is not impact the conclusion. -> this is the answer
(E) The same reason as (B) -> eliminate

So my answer is (D)

[spoiler]yep
OA D[/spoiler]
Join the discussion