I just searched NY times. There are cases in which
to be attacked as + past participle
is used. Nowhere is the other form used, i.e.
an attack as + past participle
Maybe the 1st is idiomatic and the 2nd is not.
Based on this I will eliminate all answers that have
attacks as ....
B&D are the only ones left.
D states that the test was revised in the past because it is still being attacked in the presence. As the revision is the result of the attacks, I would assume that the attacks should be preceding the revision in time.
So I would pick B
to be attacked as + past participle
is used. Nowhere is the other form used, i.e.
an attack as + past participle
Maybe the 1st is idiomatic and the 2nd is not.
Based on this I will eliminate all answers that have
attacks as ....
B&D are the only ones left.
D states that the test was revised in the past because it is still being attacked in the presence. As the revision is the result of the attacks, I would assume that the attacks should be preceding the revision in time.
So I would pick B
Last edited by xyzabc123 on Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.












