The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full

This topic has expert replies
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force a rethinking of the role of comets in the delivery of organic compounds to the evolving Earth.

(A) The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force

(B) The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- as well as space-based telescopes, provided new insights into how comets form and thus possibly forcing

(C) When a comet's spectacular disintegration occurred in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes last year, it provided new insights into how comets form and thus may possibly force

(D) Last year, in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes, a comet's spectacular disintegration provided new insights into how comets form and thus possibly forcing

(E) Last year, in full view of ground- as well as space-based telescopes, the spectacular disintegration of a comet has provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
Followed by:5 members

by deloitte247 » Fri Jun 15, 2018 1:23 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

This is a bit technical nevertheless, it requires a simple analysis to unravel the hidden answer in the array of options below.

In the Option A - INCORRECT. The correctness of the statement herein is not the focus but how fitting and appropriate to the question raised. We are supposed to summarize in other ways not write exactly what's in the question.

In Option B - INCORRECT. The only difference between Options A and B is the punctuation which looks well set to separate the major keywords but does not cover enough in terms of meaning.

Option C - CORRECT. Since we are talking about an event that happened in the past then we can't overlook the usage of a powerful adverbial of time ''when'' which is well positioned to remind the reader about the time of the event. The separation with a comma is also intended to give a simpler meaning to the audience.

In Option D - INCORRECT. Conspicuously missing here is case of improper sentence formation without any regard for the separation of the keywords in order to appeal to the wider audience. The absence of comma sign is here a major concern for this option, hence, it'd have been correct also.

Option E - INCORRECT. This is also a bit difficult to discern on time because it appears too emphatic and indirect.

• Page 1 of 1