Only when due to can be replaced by " be caused " it is correct then.ichadaram wrote:Hi
Can anybody explain the difference between "because of" and "due to" with an example?
Thnaks
due to is different from because of. for example
the football match was canceled because of rain ( correct ) but the football match was canceled due to rain ( incorrect )
the football match's cancel was due to rain ( correct ) because in this case the football match's cancel was caused by rain.
Is this clear?
To recap: only when due to can be replaced by " be caused " the use of due to is correct.












