BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Amounting and amount to

Expert replies
by amysky_0205 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:58 pm
For the first time in the modern era, non-Hispanic Whites are officially a minority in California, which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly there-quarters only a decade ago.

A. which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters only a decade ago
B. which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from a decade ago, when it was nearly three-quarters
C. and that amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from a decade ago, when they were nearly three-quarters
D. amounting to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters a decade ago
E. amounting to a little less than half the population of the state, down from what it was a decade ago by nearly three-quarters

OA: D

Can someone explain this one?
Also, I would like to know the difference between amounting and amount to

thank u!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:57 am
amysky_0205 wrote:For the first time in the modern era, non-Hispanic Whites are officially a minority in California, which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly there-quarters only a decade ago.

A. which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters only a decade ago
B. which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from a decade ago, when it was nearly three-quarters
C. and that amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from a decade ago, when they were nearly three-quarters
D. amounting to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters a decade ago
E. amounting to a little less than half the population of the state, down from what it was a decade ago by nearly three-quarters

OA: D

Can someone explain this one?
Also, I would like to know the difference between amounting and amount to

thank u!
In A and B, which seems to refer to California, implying that CALIFORNIA amounts to a little less than half the population -- a nonsensical meaning.
Eliminate A and B.

In C, that lacks a clear antecedent.
Eliminate C.

In E, it lacks a clear antecedent.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.

Here, amounts and amounting serve different grammatical functions.
The subject of amounts in A, B and C is the preceding pronoun (which/that).
The result is a nonsensical/unclear meaning.
But COMMA + VERBing refers to the SUBJECT OF THE PRECEDING CLAUSE.
Thus, in the OA, amounting refers to non-Hispanic Whites, conveying the intended meaning: that NON-HISPANIC WHITES are AMOUNTING to a little less than half the population.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:20 am
The issue here is not really the distinction between "amounts to" and "amounting," but the distinction between modifiers that begin with "which" and those that begin with a present participle (anything ending in -ing).

Any modifier that begins with "... , which..." is a noun modifier - it's giving you information about a person or thing - and it must modify the noun that directly precedes it. As Mitch said, the "which" clause in A and B is modifying "California," implying that California amounts to half the population....

A modifier following a comma that begins with a present participle, however, is an adverbial modifier - it's modifying the verb or the entire clause. Because it can modify the verb or the clause, it doesn't have to be next to anything in particular. Here, "amounting to half the population" is giving us more information about the entire idea that "non-Hispanic Whites are officially a minority." We need the adverbial modifier here.

Whenever you a split like this:
... , which...
... , ____ing...

Ask yourself - is this modifier giving me more information about a noun or about a verb/clause?
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:17 pm
ceilidh.erickson wrote:The issue here is not really the distinction between "amounts to" and "amounting," but the distinction between modifiers that begin with "which" and those that begin with a present participle (anything ending in -ing).

Any modifier that begins with "... , which..." is a noun modifier - it's giving you information about a person or thing - and it must modify the noun that directly precedes it. As Mitch said, the "which" clause in A and B is modifying "California," implying that California amounts to half the population....

A modifier following a comma that begins with a present participle, however, is an adverbial modifier - it's modifying the verb or the entire clause. Because it can modify the verb or the clause, it doesn't have to be next to anything in particular. Here, "amounting to half the population" is giving us more information about the entire idea that "non-Hispanic Whites are officially a minority." We need the adverbial modifier here.

Whenever you a split like this:
... , which...
... , ____ing...

Ask yourself - is this modifier giving me more information about a noun or about a verb/clause?
GREAT.

I want to follow use but when I click the relevant box, is dose not work, pls, help
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1