BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Bad teens

Expert replies
by Rastis » Tue Dec 09, 2014 10:55 am
Citizens of Parktown are worried by the increased frequency of serious crimes committed by local teenagers. In response, the city government has instituted a series of measures designed to keep teenagers at home in the late evening. Even if the measures succeed in keeping teenagers at home, however, they are unlikely to affect the problem that concerns citizens, since most crimes committed by local teenagers take place between 3 pm and 6 pm.

Which of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the argument?

a) Similar measures adopted in other places have failed to reduce the number of teenagers on the streets in the late evening.

b) The crimes committed by teenagers in the afternoon are mostly small thefts and inconsequential vandalism.

c) Teenagers are much less likely to commit serious crimes when they are at home than when they are not at home.

d) Any decrease in the need for police patrols in the late evening would not mean that there could be more intensive patrolling in the afternoon.

e) The schools in Parktwon have introduced a number of after-school programs that will be available to teenagers until 6 pm on weekday afternoons.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Dec 11, 2014 4:39 am
Rastis wrote:Citizens of Parktown are worried by the increased frequency of serious crimes committed by local teenagers. In response, the city government has instituted a series of measures designed to keep teenagers at home in the late evening. Even if the measures succeed in keeping teenagers at home, however, they are unlikely to affect the problem that concerns citizens, since most crimes committed by local teenagers take place between 3 pm and 6 pm.

Which of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the argument?

a) Similar measures adopted in other places have failed to reduce the number of teenagers on the streets in the late evening.

b) The crimes committed by teenagers in the afternoon are mostly small thefts and inconsequential vandalism.

c) Teenagers are much less likely to commit serious crimes when they are at home than when they are not at home.

d) Any decrease in the need for police patrols in the late evening would not mean that there could be more intensive patrolling in the afternoon.

e) The schools in Parktwon have introduced a number of after-school programs that will be available to teenagers until 6 pm on weekday afternoons.
Premise: The city government has instituted measures to keep teenagers at home in the late evening, but MOST CRIMES committed by teenagers take place between 3pm and 6pm.
Conclusion: The new measures are unlikely to curb the increase in SERIOUS CRIMES.

Notice the change in LANGUAGE and SCOPE.
The premise is about MOST CRIMES, but the conclusion is about SERIOUS CRIMES.
MOST CRIMES ≠ SERIOUS CRIMES.
The assumption here is that the CRIMES committed between 3pm and 6pm are SERIOUS.
To break the link between the premise and the conclusion, the correct answer must show that the CRIMES committed between 3pm and 6pm are NOT SERIOUS.

Answer choice B does just that: Crimes committed by teenagers in the afternoon are mostly small thefts and inconsequential vandalism.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Rastis » Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:51 am
But isn't that answer actually strengthening the conclusion? The conclusion you state is that the curbing of serious crimes won't happen. Answer choice B would actually strengthen that. If we're talking about weakening the PLAN, then answer choice B would work.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Dec 11, 2014 7:08 am
Rastis wrote:But isn't that answer actually strengthening the conclusion? The conclusion you state is that the curbing of serious crimes won't happen. Answer choice B would actually strengthen that. If we're talking about weakening the PLAN, then answer choice B would work.
The conclusion is that the plan (keeping teenagers at home in the late evening) is UNLIKELY to affect the problem that concerns citizens (the commission of serious crimes).
To weaken this conclusion, the correct answer must show that the plan WILL affect the problem that concerns citizens: that keeping teenagers at home in the late evening WILL lead to a decrease in the commission of serious crimes.
B states that only non-serious crimes are committed in the afternoon, implying that serious crimes are committed only at night.
Thus, keeping teenagers at home in the late evening WILL lead to a decrease in the commission of serious crimes, WEAKENING the conclusion that the plan is UNLIKELY to affect the problem that concerns citizens.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by shantanuchandra » Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:09 pm
@GMATGuruNY

When you say that "B states that only non-serious crimes are committed in the afternoon, implying that serious crimes are committed only at night. "

Why are you assuming that no crimes are happening at daytime and the serious crimes happen at night time?
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jun 16, 2015 6:03 am
shantanuchandra wrote:@GMATGuruNY

Why are you assuming that no crimes are happening at daytime
The argument concludes that the frequency of SERIOUS crimes will not be reduced.
To support this conclusion, the passage cites the following premise:
Most crimes committed by local teenagers take place between 3 pm and 6 pm.
According to the OA, crimes committed in the afternoon are mostly SMALL and INCONSEQUENTIAL.
Since crimes committed between 3 and 6pm are SMALL and INCONSEQUENTIAL, they cannot be cited as evidence that the frequency of SERIOUS crimes will not be reduced.
Thus, the conclusion of the passage is weakened.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion