Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Bad teens

Expert replies
by Rastis » Tue Dec 09, 2014 10:55 am
Citizens of Parktown are worried by the increased frequency of serious crimes committed by local teenagers. In response, the city government has instituted a series of measures designed to keep teenagers at home in the late evening. Even if the measures succeed in keeping teenagers at home, however, they are unlikely to affect the problem that concerns citizens, since most crimes committed by local teenagers take place between 3 pm and 6 pm.

Which of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the argument?

a) Similar measures adopted in other places have failed to reduce the number of teenagers on the streets in the late evening.

b) The crimes committed by teenagers in the afternoon are mostly small thefts and inconsequential vandalism.

c) Teenagers are much less likely to commit serious crimes when they are at home than when they are not at home.

d) Any decrease in the need for police patrols in the late evening would not mean that there could be more intensive patrolling in the afternoon.

e) The schools in Parktwon have introduced a number of after-school programs that will be available to teenagers until 6 pm on weekday afternoons.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Dec 11, 2014 4:39 am
Rastis wrote:Citizens of Parktown are worried by the increased frequency of serious crimes committed by local teenagers. In response, the city government has instituted a series of measures designed to keep teenagers at home in the late evening. Even if the measures succeed in keeping teenagers at home, however, they are unlikely to affect the problem that concerns citizens, since most crimes committed by local teenagers take place between 3 pm and 6 pm.

Which of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the argument?

a) Similar measures adopted in other places have failed to reduce the number of teenagers on the streets in the late evening.

b) The crimes committed by teenagers in the afternoon are mostly small thefts and inconsequential vandalism.

c) Teenagers are much less likely to commit serious crimes when they are at home than when they are not at home.

d) Any decrease in the need for police patrols in the late evening would not mean that there could be more intensive patrolling in the afternoon.

e) The schools in Parktwon have introduced a number of after-school programs that will be available to teenagers until 6 pm on weekday afternoons.
Premise: The city government has instituted measures to keep teenagers at home in the late evening, but MOST CRIMES committed by teenagers take place between 3pm and 6pm.
Conclusion: The new measures are unlikely to curb the increase in SERIOUS CRIMES.

Notice the change in LANGUAGE and SCOPE.
The premise is about MOST CRIMES, but the conclusion is about SERIOUS CRIMES.
MOST CRIMES ≠ SERIOUS CRIMES.
The assumption here is that the CRIMES committed between 3pm and 6pm are SERIOUS.
To break the link between the premise and the conclusion, the correct answer must show that the CRIMES committed between 3pm and 6pm are NOT SERIOUS.

Answer choice B does just that: Crimes committed by teenagers in the afternoon are mostly small thefts and inconsequential vandalism.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Rastis » Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:51 am
But isn't that answer actually strengthening the conclusion? The conclusion you state is that the curbing of serious crimes won't happen. Answer choice B would actually strengthen that. If we're talking about weakening the PLAN, then answer choice B would work.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Dec 11, 2014 7:08 am
Rastis wrote:But isn't that answer actually strengthening the conclusion? The conclusion you state is that the curbing of serious crimes won't happen. Answer choice B would actually strengthen that. If we're talking about weakening the PLAN, then answer choice B would work.
The conclusion is that the plan (keeping teenagers at home in the late evening) is UNLIKELY to affect the problem that concerns citizens (the commission of serious crimes).
To weaken this conclusion, the correct answer must show that the plan WILL affect the problem that concerns citizens: that keeping teenagers at home in the late evening WILL lead to a decrease in the commission of serious crimes.
B states that only non-serious crimes are committed in the afternoon, implying that serious crimes are committed only at night.
Thus, keeping teenagers at home in the late evening WILL lead to a decrease in the commission of serious crimes, WEAKENING the conclusion that the plan is UNLIKELY to affect the problem that concerns citizens.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by shantanuchandra » Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:09 pm
@GMATGuruNY

When you say that "B states that only non-serious crimes are committed in the afternoon, implying that serious crimes are committed only at night. "

Why are you assuming that no crimes are happening at daytime and the serious crimes happen at night time?
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jun 16, 2015 6:03 am
shantanuchandra wrote:@GMATGuruNY

Why are you assuming that no crimes are happening at daytime
The argument concludes that the frequency of SERIOUS crimes will not be reduced.
To support this conclusion, the passage cites the following premise:
Most crimes committed by local teenagers take place between 3 pm and 6 pm.
According to the OA, crimes committed in the afternoon are mostly SMALL and INCONSEQUENTIAL.
Since crimes committed between 3 and 6pm are SMALL and INCONSEQUENTIAL, they cannot be cited as evidence that the frequency of SERIOUS crimes will not be reduced.
Thus, the conclusion of the passage is weakened.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion