BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Average - two greatest

Expert replies
by Xbond » Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:03 pm
Hi there,

Could you help me to understand the concept

A certain list consists of five different integers. Is the average (arithmetic mean) of the two greatest integers in the list greater than 70 ?

(1) The median of the integers in the list is 70

(2) The average of the integers in the list is 70

The answer is D but I select A. I didn't succeed to see why (2) is right.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by tohellandback » Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:58 pm
I think D is the riht answer
option 1 is clear. It is the median so the two greatest numbers will both be greater than 70

2) if we take an average: the ideal case is all numbers are 70. if any number is less than 70, there must be another number greater than 70 to compensate that.
there are five DIFFERENT integers. there must be atleast two numbers less than 70 and two greater than 70

ex: ideal case: 70,70,70,70,70 if the numbers are different
you could write it as
68,69,70,71,72
or66,68,70,72,74
you see, you must increase two numbers to compensate the loss

Hope it helps
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

Re: Average - two greatest

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:36 am
Xbond wrote:Hi there,

Could you help me to understand the concept

A certain list consists of five different integers. Is the average (arithmetic mean) of the two greatest integers in the list greater than 70 ?

(1) The median of the integers in the list is 70

(2) The average of the integers in the list is 70

The answer is D but I select A. I didn't succeed to see why (2) is right.
Here's another way to think about statement (2):

Every set of numbers has an average. If you chop off the lowest number in the set, what happens to the average? Well, unless every number in the set is identical, the average will always go up.

Keeping that in mind, let's rephrase the question, building in statement (2):

A set of 5 different numbers has an average of 70. If you chop off the lowest 3 numbers of the set, do the 2 remaining numbers have an average greater than 70?

Answer: definitely yes!
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:39 am
tohellandback wrote:2) if we take an average: the ideal case is all numbers are 70. if any number is less than 70, there must be another number greater than 70 to compensate that.
there are five DIFFERENT integers. there must be atleast two numbers less than 70 and two greater than 70
Your final answer is correct, but your reasoning is off.

The median of a set of numbers has an equal number of terms above it and below it.

However, that's not always true for the average (arithmetic mean) of a set.

For example:

The set {67, 68, 69, 70, 76} has an average of 70, but has 3 terms below 70, 1 term at 70 and 1 term above 70.

The set {66, 67, 68, 69, 80} has an average of 70, but has 4 terms below 70 and 1 term above 70.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by Xbond » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:56 am
many thks coach
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:31 pm
Hi Stuart I still think my reasoning was correct.
I think I didn't put it correctly. Let me say the sum of the two greatest integers has to be more than 140.
I hope I am clear now.

Thanks for pointing it out.
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
tohellandback wrote:2) if we take an average: the ideal case is all numbers are 70. if any number is less than 70, there must be another number greater than 70 to compensate that.
there are five DIFFERENT integers. there must be atleast two numbers less than 70 and two greater than 70
Your final answer is correct, but your reasoning is off.

The median of a set of numbers has an equal number of terms above it and below it.

However, that's not always true for the average (arithmetic mean) of a set.

For example:

The set {67, 68, 69, 70, 76} has an average of 70, but has 3 terms below 70, 1 term at 70 and 1 term above 70.

The set {66, 67, 68, 69, 80} has an average of 70, but has 4 terms below 70 and 1 term above 70.
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion