• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## Authors writing detective stories ##### This topic has 1 expert reply and 1 member reply ### Top Member ## Authors writing detective stories Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals' well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above? A) A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator. B) Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation. C) Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly. D) Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult. E) Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life. Can some Experts explain logically? OA D ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 04 Oct 2017 Posted: 551 messages Followed by: 11 members Upvotes: 180 Top Reply This question asks you to draw a conclusion from the given evidence. The correct choice MUST be true. Choice A: This choice states that there is only one way to construct a "well-written detective story." This cannot be concluded from the argument. Choice B: This one might tempt you. Some authors DO use an incompetent investigator. However, the passage does not say that this is done to "show the complexities of an investigation." Using both an incompetent and a competent investigator is done to provide complexity to the reader in solving the investigation. Choice C: This is too definite a claim. Never? The passage uses the term "frequently," not "always." Choice D: This is the correct choice. Notice the less definite wording, which is often found in the correct choice in inference questions. Yes, authors CAN use separate investigative accounts to make predicting the outcome more difficult. This is is virtually a paraphrase of the last sentence of the passage. Choice E: Real life is not mentioned in the passage. I'm available if you'd like a follow up. _________________ GMAT Prep From The Economist We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee. Our average student improves 98 points. Free 7-Day Test Prep with Economist GMAT Tutor - Receive free access to the top-rated GMAT prep course including a 1-on-1 strategy session, 2 full-length tests, and 5 ask-a-tutor messages. Get started now. ### Top Member Moderator Joined 07 Sep 2017 Posted: 3174 messages Followed by: 8 members EconomistGMATTutor wrote: This question asks you to draw a conclusion from the given evidence. The correct choice MUST be true. Choice A: This choice states that there is only one way to construct a "well-written detective story." This cannot be concluded from the argument. Choice B: This one might tempt you. Some authors DO use an incompetent investigator. However, the passage does not say that this is done to "show the complexities of an investigation." Using both an incompetent and a competent investigator is done to provide complexity to the reader in solving the investigation. Choice C: This is too definite a claim. Never? The passage uses the term "frequently," not "always." Choice D: This is the correct choice. Notice the less definite wording, which is often found in the correct choice in inference questions. Yes, authors CAN use separate investigative accounts to make predicting the outcome more difficult. This is is virtually a paraphrase of the last sentence of the passage. Choice E: Real life is not mentioned in the passage. I'm available if you'd like a follow up. Thanks a lot! • FREE GMAT Exam Know how you'd score today for$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

### Top First Responders*

1 Ian Stewart 44 first replies
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow 33 first replies
3 Scott@TargetTestPrep 32 first replies
4 Jay@ManhattanReview 24 first replies
5 GMATGuruNY 18 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

149 posts
2 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

93 posts
3 Ian Stewart

GMATiX Teacher

53 posts
4 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

50 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

30 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts