Antipsychotic Drugs

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 727
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:32 pm
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:1 members

Antipsychotic Drugs

by umaa » Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:33 pm
Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and younger, the number taking antipsychotic medicines soared 73 percent in the last four years. That is greater than the increase in the number of adults taking antipsychotic medicines during the same period.

Lucy: But the use of antipsychotic drugs by adults is considered normal at the current rate of 11 adults per 1,000 taking the drugs. In contrast, the number of children on antipsychotic medication last year was 6.6 per 1,000 children.

Lucy’s argument relies on the assumption that ______.
A. normal levels of antipsychotic drug use are rarely exceeded.
B. the percentage of adults taking antipsychotic medication is always higher than the percentage of children on such medication.
C. the use of antipsychotic medication in children is no different from the use of such medications in adults.
D. Antoine is not consciously distorting the statistics he presents.
E. a rapid increase in the number of children taking antipsychotic drugs generates more fear of random violence by adolescents than does knowledge of the absolute number of children on such medications.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:27 pm
IMO, the answer should be E. Here's why:

[spoiler]A, B, C are out of scope (B is also a bit extreme). D isn't as assumption she makes... she presents raw facts, and nothing Antoine states can change them.[/spoiler]
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

by madhur_ahuja » Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:37 pm
IMO C

The use of but in the Lucy response presents a contrast and C justifies that contrast.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
Thanked: 104 times
Followed by:1 members

by scoobydooby » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:11 pm
E for me as well.

A large % increase does not necessarily mean a large increase in numbers in ablsolute terms. E addresses this.

Legendary Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:04 pm
Location: Tokyo
Thanked: 81 times
GMAT Score:680

by tohellandback » Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:31 am
IMO C,
both groups cannot be compared unless the use of antipsychotic medicines is similar in both groups.
E IMO is out of scope. fear of random violence>?????
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:600

by viju9162 » Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:47 am
The answer is C.

A large % increase does not necessarily mean a large increase in numbers in ablsolute terms. Where is the author mentioning about this in E ?
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group

Legendary Member
Posts: 727
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:32 pm
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:1 members

by umaa » Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:53 am
OA is C

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:26 am

by khanshainur » Sun May 15, 2016 11:21 pm
I will Go with option С in this case