BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

assumption

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:41 am
Location: india
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

assumption

by armaan700+ » Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:41 am
Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled, our current estimate of reserves that exist underground must be multiplied by a factor of 10,000. From this we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries, even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

To reach the stated conclusion, the author must assume which of the following?

A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1578
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 am
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:760

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:45 am
armaan700+ wrote:Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled, our current estimate of reserves that exist underground must be multiplied by a factor of 10,000. From this we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries, even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

To reach the stated conclusion, the author must assume which of the following?

A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before
I would choose A.

B- he accounts that even if consumption increases his conclusion would still be valid

C- This is irrelevant, even if oil isn't important it doesn't change the fact that there is enough oil available to meet the world's energy needs

D- This isn't vital for the argument.

E- He never discusses how feasible drilling for oil is, so this is out of scope.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1275
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:13 pm
Location: Arabian Sea
Thanked: 125 times
Followed by:2 members

by ajith » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:04 am
armaan700+ wrote:Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled, our current estimate of reserves that exist underground must be multiplied by a factor of 10,000. From this we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries, even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

To reach the stated conclusion, the author must assume which of the following?

A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before
A - My choice of answer the conclusion about how we can meet the oil needs for 5 centuries is based on this
B - No, the passage indicates otherwise
C - Well, may be the third best choice
D - nothing of that sort is indicated in the passage
E - Second best choice for me but goes; a little out of scope
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
Thanked: 137 times
Followed by:5 members

by thephoenix » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:42 am
A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
[Hold it]
B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
[This is already taken into account . NEGATING it does not fail the conclusion]
C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
[Not possible, since if oil is not an energy source, conclusion is still valid]
D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
[Out of scope- also even if future consumption grows its ok]
E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before
[Out of scope]
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 5:53 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by dmitriyaleyev » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:35 pm
thephoenix wrote:A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
[Hold it]
B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
[This is already taken into account . NEGATING it does not fail the conclusion]
C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
[Not possible, since if oil is not an energy source, conclusion is still valid]
D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
[Out of scope- also even if future consumption grows its ok]
E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before
[Out of scope]
Good technique:) that's how i eliminate too.

I would go with A
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Thu Feb 04, 2010 6:24 am
armaan700+ wrote:Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled, our current estimate of reserves that exist underground must be multiplied by a factor of 10,000. From this we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries, even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

To reach the stated conclusion, the author must assume which of the following?

Assumption questions allow us to double check our answer choices by using Negation Technique. When the CORRECT answer choice is negated, the answer MUST WEAKEN the argument. Lets see which one does that for us :

A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
Correct : On negating this answer choice states something like.... It is NOT possible to recover blah blah blah of the world. This WEAKENS the argument. Hence this is the correct answer choice.

B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
Incorrect : It is already ASSUMED in the stimulus that consumption will grow rapidly (at an accelerating rate)

C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
Incorrect : Irrelevant to the scope of our argument

D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
Incorrect : Population growth is clearly out of scope

E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before
Incorrect : On negating, this answer choice DOES NOT WEAKEN the argument. Eliminated !
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:23 am

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 11:18 pm
Cannot decide between B and D. Can anyone brake down these two choices for me please
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1