BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Assumption Problem

Expert replies
by yvonne0923 » Thu May 12, 2011 4:49 pm
To increase profits, management should reinvest in employee training, product development, or market research. When management instead chooses to cut expenditures in these areas, a vicious cycle results. The cost-cutting causes a reduction in wages, employee skills, and product appeal. These effects in turn increase complaints and turnover among employees, increase customer dissatisfaction, and drease market share. Reduced sales and constricted profit margins cause a financial squeeze on the company, which in turn forces management to cut costs even more.

The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?

A. A drease in employee wages acts as a catalyst for employees to find ways to keep their jobs and appear better than their coworkers.

B. Some products lines bring in less revenue than their overall cost and, when discontinued, actually improve the bottom line.

C. When management cuts costs to increase profits, it does not take into adequate consideration the lost revenue that results from cost cuttiing.

D. Employee dissatisfaction only occurs as a result of reduced wages or decreased employee training.

E. Current customers do not differ with respect to the level of dissatisfaction that would case them to purchase products elsewhere.



























____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Answer: C

Why C is right? How to use the method of "Assumption Negation Method" to apply to choice C in order to attach this problem?

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by smackmartine » Thu May 12, 2011 7:15 pm
IMO C

According to Powerscore,its a good idea to perform negation test on contender options for Assumption questions.

After you negate the option, if the option weakens the argument, it is a correct answer choice. If the negation strengthens or is simply irrelevant/neural to the argument , its a incorrect option.

The argument says that cost cutting causes further cost cuts (The cost-cutting causes a reduction in wages.......which in turn forces management to cut costs even more.)

If we negate option C , it will be :

When management cuts costs to increase profits, it does take into adequate consideration the lost revenue that results from cost cuttiing.

If this were true , cost cutting would have NEVER caused further cost cuts. So its contradicting the argument.

Hence Option C is correct.
Last edited by smackmartine on Thu May 12, 2011 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by Bek » Thu May 12, 2011 7:23 pm
A vicious cycle includes three hierarchal steps:

1) The cost-cutting causes a reduction in wages, employee skills, and product appeal.

2) These effects in turn increase complaints and turnover among employees, increase customer dissatisfaction, and decrease market share.

3) Reduced sales and constricted profit margins cause a financial squeeze on the company, which in turn forces management to cut costs even more.

This means that if first Step doesn't occur next Steps will not take place.
If management doesn't cut costs, the vicious cycle described above could not result.
Therefore, we should find the answer which causes first Step, the cost-cutting.
Join the discussion

by yvonne0923 » Thu May 12, 2011 11:51 pm
smackmartine wrote:IMO C

According to Powerscore,its a good idea to perform negation test on contender options for Assumption questions.

After you negate the option, if the option weakens the argument, it is a correct answer choice. If the negation strengthens or is simply irrelevant/neural to the argument , its a incorrect option.

The argument says that cost cutting causes further cost cuts (The cost-cutting causes a reduction in wages.......which in turn forces management to cut costs even more.)

If we negate option C , it will be :

When management cuts costs to increase profits, it does take into adequate consideration the lost revenue that results from cost cuttiing.

If this were true , cost cutting would have NEVER caused further cost cuts. So its contradicting the argument.

Hence Option C is correct.

Thanks for your explanation! Also, I have one more question about CR problems. Except the Negation method for Assumption problems, are there any other particular methods for different types of CR problems, such as weaken, strengthen, etc...
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Fri May 13, 2011 12:00 am
Except the Negation method for Assumption problems, are there any other particular methods for different types of CR problems, such as weaken, strengthen, etc...
Its difficult to summarize everything in one post, and frankly speaking its time consuming too.
GMAT PowerScore Critical Reasoning Bible is the best for CR (IMO). My experience with this book has been great.
It will definitely improve your pattern of thinking and reasoning. Good luck!
Join the discussion

by yvonne0923 » Fri May 13, 2011 12:04 am
smackmartine wrote:
Except the Negation method for Assumption problems, are there any other particular methods for different types of CR problems, such as weaken, strengthen, etc...
Its difficult to summarize everything in one post, and frankly speaking its time consuming too.
GMAT PowerScore Critical Reasoning Bible is the best for CR (IMO). My experience with this book has been great.
It will definitely improve your pattern of thinking and reasoning. Good luck!

Thanks for your information,I will go and read the book first.
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Tue May 17, 2011 8:36 am
can anyone explain why E is wrong
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion