As an actress and, more importantly...OG12 dianostic Q49

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:13 pm
chendawg wrote:
atulmangal wrote:if including is modifying only "actors", then what about this Op F, is this gonna be correct???

Op F) Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, training several generations of actors including Marlon Brando and Robert de Niro.

Thanks a lot
Atul
Edit - Misread your option F. I think it'd be incorrect because it's talking about generations in general and not the actors.

The reason option B is incorrect (in addition to the tense error-include is present tense and trained is past) is because of the word "who" before include. Because who must modify "actors", the sentence doesn't make sense. The sentence would mean that Stella Adler trained several generations of actors that literally "owned" Marlon Brando and Robert De Niro.
I think Opt F would be Correct
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 944
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:5 members

by RBBmba@2014 » Tue Aug 18, 2015 1:53 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
As an Actress and, more importantly, as a teacher of acting, Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, who trained several generations of actors including Marlon Brando and Robert Deniro.

a.Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, who trained several generations of actors including

b. Stella Adler, one of the most influential artists in the American theater, trained several generations of actors who include

c. Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, training several generations of actors, whose ranks included

d. One of the most influential artist in the American theater was Stella Adler, who trained several generations of actors including

e. One of the most influential artist in the American theater, Stella Adler, trained several generations of actors whose ranks included
Look for easy reasons to eliminate answers.

In B, include should not be in the present tense, given that the main verb trained is in the past tense. All the verbs should be in the same tense unless a change in tense is necessary. Eliminate B.

The correct answer is C.
Hi GMATGuruNY,
Few quick questions on this: actors who include and actors, whose ranks included -- is there any PRIME differences between these two phrases EXCEPT the Tense aspect ?

Isn't the second PHRASE less direct than the first one ?

Is this usage common and conventional on GMAT ?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Aug 18, 2015 4:51 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:Hi GMATGuruNY,
Few quick questions on this: actors who include and actors, whose ranks included -- is there any PRIME differences between these two phrases EXCEPT the Tense aspect ?

Isn't the second PHRASE less direct than the first one ?

Is this usage common and conventional on GMAT ?
A generation = approximately 30 years -- the time it takes a group of people to grow up and bear children.
Implication:
Approximately 30 years pass between one generation of people and the next.

B, rephrased in the past:
several generations of actors who included Marlon Brando
Conveyed meaning:
At some point, ACTORS taught by Stella Adler INCLUDED MARLON BRANDO.
Thirty years later, DIFFERENT ACTORS taught by Stella Adler INCLUDED MARLON BRANDO.
Another thirty years later, an entirely NEW GROUP of actors taught by Stella Adler INCLUDED MARLON BRANDO.
This meaning implies that Marlon Brando was INCLUDED over the course of 90 YEARS.
Not the intended meaning.

In the OA, ranks = members of EVERY RANKING.
In other words, the entire LIST of members.
Thus, the OA conveys the following meaning:
The LIST of actors taught by Stella Adler includes Marlon Brando.
This meaning is sensical.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Tue Aug 18, 2015 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 944
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:5 members

by RBBmba@2014 » Tue Aug 18, 2015 6:42 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
RBBmba@2014 wrote:Hi GMATGuruNY,
Few quick questions on this: actors who include and actors, whose ranks included -- is there any PRIME differences between these two phrases EXCEPT the Tense aspect ?

Isn't the second PHRASE less direct than the first one ?

Is this usage common and conventional on GMAT ?
A generation is a group born around the same time.
Alright.
GMATGuruNY wrote:B, rephrased in the past:
several generations of actors who included Marlon Brando
Conveyed meaning:
At least three groups born around the same time INCLUDED MARLON BRANDO.
Not the intended meaning.
Not able to understand the part in RED.

At least three groups [OF ACTORS] born around the same time INCLUDED MARLON BRANDO -- How this is wrong here and how EXACTLY this phrase is DIFFERENT from the phrase in C i.e. several generations of actors, whose ranks included ?

Please help!

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Aug 18, 2015 10:03 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:Not able to understand
In my post above, I've clarified the reasoning.
Please check the amended post.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 944
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:5 members

by RBBmba@2014 » Tue Aug 18, 2015 11:02 pm
That's GREAT Mitch. Much thanks!

Just couple of quick questions -

1. If B were several generations of actors including Marlon Brando, then I guess this particular phrase would make sense. Thoughts ?
GMATGuruNY wrote:In the OA, ranks = members of EVERY RANKING.
In other words, the entire LIST of members.
How EXACTLY we're CORRELATING these TWO parts ?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:13 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:That's GREAT Mitch. Much thanks!

Just couple of quick questions -

1. If B were several generations of actors including Marlon Brando, then I guess this particular phrase would make sense. Thoughts ?
This wording is not viable.
The phrase in red implies that the ACTORS themselves were INCLUDING Marlon Brando.
Not so.
The ACTORS did not select Marlon Brando to participate in Stella Adler's class.

Please do not attempt to correct wrong answer choices.
The goal here is to identify WHY incorrect answer choices are wrong, not to fix them.
In many cases, an incorrect answer choice cannot be easily fixed.
GMATGuruNY wrote:In the OA, ranks = members of EVERY RANKING.
In other words, the entire LIST of members.
How EXACTLY we're CORRELATING these TWO parts ?
One dictionary definition of ranks:
The people belonging to or constituting a group or class.
In other words, the entire list of members.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:42 am

by sarap5511 » Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:11 pm
rx_11 wrote:As an actress and, more importantly, as a teacher of acting, Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, who trained several generations of actors including Marlon Brando and Robert de Niro.

A. Same as above
B. Stella Adler, one of the most influential artists in the American theater, trained several generations of actors who include
C. Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, training several generations of actors whose ranks included
D. one of the most influential artists in the American theater was Stella Adler, who trained several generations of actors including
E. one of the most influential artists in the American theater, Stella Adler, trained several generations of actors whose ranks included
lunarpower, GMATGuruNY -

I didnt really get two things here -

1. who trained several generations of actors including - Why isnt including modifying "actors"? (After including we have name of actors)
2. training several generations of actors whose ranks included - how are ranks described by actors names??

Thanks!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:01 am
Thanked: 2 times

by jain2016 » Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:17 pm
Hi Experts ,

Everything is cleared , but I still don't understand the reason to eliminate option A.

Please advise.

Thanks,

SJ

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 12:25 am

by hardwork » Tue Nov 15, 2016 8:50 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
As an Actress and, more importantly, as a teacher of acting, Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, who trained several generations of actors including Marlon Brando and Robert Deniro.

a.Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, who trained several generations of actors including

b. Stella Adler, one of the most influential artists in the American theater, trained several generations of actors who include

c. Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, training several generations of actors, whose ranks included

d. One of the most influential artist in the American theater was Stella Adler, who trained several generations of actors including

e. One of the most influential artist in the American theater, Stella Adler, trained several generations of actors whose ranks included
Look for easy reasons to eliminate answers.

In D and E, as an actress and as a teacher are incorrectly modifying one. Eliminate D and E.

In A, who is incorrectly modifying artists. The intended meaning is that Stella Adler trained several generations of actors. Eliminate A.

In B, include should not be in the present tense, given that the main verb trained is in the past tense. All the verbs should be in the same tense unless a change in tense is necessary. Eliminate B.

The correct answer is C.
Excuse me!Sir! Could you explain the use of comma+training in choice C? Is there any logical relationship to use comma+doing?Thanks in advance!
What is the reason to use ranks in the correct answer?Thanks!!