BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Artistic Excellence

Expert replies
by italian7745 » Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:14 pm
The stated goal of the government's funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims, however, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support, will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton's argument is based?

(A) Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence.
(B) Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive.
(C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence.
(D) Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence, he or she will never accept government funding.
(E) A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by getso » Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:28 pm
OA E
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:35 pm
IMO E
Join the discussion

by gmatv09 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:38 am
Senators claim - a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist

hence IMO E
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:48 am
Asumption must be

1, in context of evidence
2.support conclusion
3,pass negation test

A, choice which pass negation test but is not in context of evidence is attractive but wrong

B, choice which support conclusion but dose not pass negation test is attractive but wrong. this choice is strengthener

My friends, remember 123AB for assumption question. this save your life.

come back to the discussed question

E pass negation test. This means negation of E weaken the arguement. But E is not in context of evidence and wrong

E show the case A above.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:51 am
Sory, A pass negation test but not is in context of evidence

A show the case A above.

E is correct.
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:52 am
I will go with E

duongthang : When you said "remember 123AB for assumption question", AB must be a typo error. Thanks for letting know the points to be remembered.

It will really help to solve assumption questions.

Regards,
Viju
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:17 pm
italian7745 wrote:The stated goal of the government's funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims, however, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support, will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton's argument is based?

(A) Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence.
(B) Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive.
(C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence.
(D) Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence, he or she will never accept government funding.
(E) A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence.
The argument can be reduced to this paraphrase: "because government-funded artwork can't reflect independent artistic conscience, government funding cannot lead to creation of works with artistic excellence" or "because no ind. art consc., no artistic excellence."

This is actually a common form of argument: "because no A, no B". In this kind of argument, the arguer is assuming that A is necessary for B. We can use the denial test to see this: if A wasn't necessary for B, then the argument (that no A means no B) falls apart. Thus, the argument's reasoning depends on A being necessary for B. Here, the "A" is independent artistic conscience and the "B" is (true) artistic excellence. So, the author is assuming that independent artistic consicence is necessary for (true) artistic excellence. If we went into the answer choices with this prediction and then scanned for a match, then choice E clearly matches.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion