BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Artificial Sweeteners

Expert replies

by David@VeritasPrep » Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:32 am
The way to look at this is to focus on the paradox. We are trying to figure out why people who use sugar substitutes actually gain weight. They gain weight even though some of the food they consume has fewer calories.

Choice B is eliminated right out of the gate because you cannot explain a difference using something that is the same for both sides. It states is choice B that there is no added sugar in these items - hamburgers and french fries - to replace. So this cannot explain why those who use sugar substitutes actually gain weight because if they ate hamburgers and french fries before then nothing has changed. If they did not eat these things before nothing has changed. That is the problem with B, nothing has changed.

Let me give you an example, say you are applying to business school and the interviewer asks what makes you special and you reply, "I really want to go to business school." Do you see how this is a very poor answer? Not because it is offensive or silly or untrue, but because you named something that is the same for everyone applying to business school. You cannot explain a difference with something that is the same.

Or, an even better example, if I were trying to figure out why some people do better on the GMAT than others do. You cannot say that the people who do well get an 75 minutes for each section. Everyone does! You need a difference, such as "they study harder."

Answer Choice B fits the mode of "they get 75 minutes." Because nothing has changed with the use of the sweeteners, these are not even used in burgers and fries, this cannot explain how something new has happened - namely those who use the artificial sweeteners gain weight.

I wanted to explain this to you thoroughly because this is a point that can be used in many paradox questions like this one. Anytime you are seeking to explain a difference between two things, you need a difference in the answer choices.

A difference in the stimulus can only be explained by a difference in the answer choices.

By the way D gives you a very significant difference. The artificial sweetener users become addicted because, as we are told in the stimulus the sweeteners are 200 to 600 times sweeter than sugar. There is no need to assume that people who fit into answer choice D eat sugar as well as sweeteners, it says it there, "Because sugar substitutes are so sweet, those people who consume them regularly become addicted to sweetness of all types, including sugar."

Remember a difference in the stimulus can only be explained by a difference in the answer choices. You cannot explain why a certain athlete is the fastest by saying that she wears running shoes. Now a particular type of special new shoe, yes that might work as an answer....
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:47 am
Thanks David For the post.It has really given me a new perspecive to view Paradox Questions from.I now understand Choice B much better.

There is 1 last thing i wish to clarify.
The reason why I chose B was
Suppose a Person follows a Diet consisting of Burgers + Sugar for 2 months.His weight Initially is 50 Kgs
He gains weight of 2,5 Kgs each month because of the burgers + 2.5 Kgs Because of the Sugar.=5 Kgs of Weight Gain in 1 Month
In 2 Months Wt. Gain = 10 Kgs out of which 5 Kgs is because of the Burgers
His Weight Increases to 60 Kgs.
Now He changes to Sugar Substitute but continues to have Burgers for 1 Month
So His weight Increases 60 + 2.5=62.5 Kgs.
So He gains Weight of 2.5 Kgs in 1 Month
Pls tell where is the Flaw in My reasoning ? Was I assuming too Much .
Join the discussion

by vikram4689 » Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:25 pm
In your case, earlier person gained 5kgs but after taking sweetener person gained only 2.5kgs BUT the stimulus says that person experiences net weight gain,i.e. w.r.t. the gain person used to have earlier. In your case person has lost the weight because of using sweeteners and hence there is NO PARADOX.

The point that David is trying is explain is that use of sweeteners in hamburgers cannot explain why person who started using sweeteners gained weight. Because consumption of hamburgers and hence calories associated with hamburgers would remain same. For this an option that relates what happens when sweeteners are taken would help.

Hope that helps.
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion