BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Arithmetic Properties of numbers

Expert replies
by adthedaddy » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:41 am
How many integers 'n' are there such that r<n<s ?
(1) s-r=5
(2) r & s are not integers

In the OG Quant guide, the ans is given as C. In my opinion, the ans should be E.
Plz suggest.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by niketdoshi123 » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:14 am
adthedaddy wrote:How many integers 'n' are there such that r<n<s ?
(1) s-r=5
(2) r & s are not integers

In the OG Quant guide, the ans is given as C. In my opinion, the ans should be E.
Plz suggest.
combining both the statements

r & s are not integers
So let s = 6.5

s-r = 5 (from the first statement)
=> r = 6.5 - 5 = 1.5

set of integer n such that r<n<s = {2,3,4,5,6}
# of integers n = 5 , hence sufficient

the answer is C
Join the discussion

by adthedaddy » Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:36 am
Hi,
Plz explain how you calculated set of integer n={2,3,4,5,6}

The range of nos fulfilling the condition s-r=5 can be innumerable.
Join the discussion

by anuprajan5 » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:13 am
adthedaddy wrote:Hi,
Plz explain how you calculated set of integer n={2,3,4,5,6}

The range of nos fulfilling the condition s-r=5 can be innumerable.
Well s-r = 5 and r<n<s can have 2 situations.

Case a - where s and r are integers and therefore there will be 4 integers in between. Eg: 10-5 = 5 and satisfies 5<10 (r<s) and therefore the set will be 6,7,8,9

Case b - where s and r are non-integers and therefore there will be 5 integers in between. Eg: 10.5-5.5 = 5 and satisfies 5.5<10.5 (r<s) and therefore the set will be 6,7,8,9 and 10.

Through statement 1, you can have case a and b - Insufficient.
Through statement 2, just mentions that they are non-integers but does not mention any relationship.

Combining statement 1 and 2, you can confirm that there will be 5 integers. Therefore C.

Regards
Anup
Join the discussion

by adthedaddy » Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:22 am
Hi Anup,

You're getting the set as 6,7,8,9 while earlier another member solved it ans got it as {2,3,4,5,6}
Which one should be correct ?

In my opinion, there cannot be any fixed value for which you can get s-r=5 where r,s are non-integers
e.g. 10.1-5.1=5
10.2-5.2=5
10.3-5.3=5,... and so on... the count is unlimited.

How are you able to get a fixed range of nos viz. {6,7,8,9,10} or {2,3,4,5,6} ??
Join the discussion

by anuprajan5 » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:52 pm
Hi,

I thought the question was how many integers there were and not the specific set of integers. So although the set varies, the number of integers in the sets remains the same.

Regards
Anup
Join the discussion

by adthedaddy » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:01 pm
anuprajan5 wrote:Hi,

I thought the question was how many integers there were and not the specific set of integers. So although the set varies, the number of integers in the sets remains the same.

Regards
Anup
Ok.. My query is the same - how can we find the 5 integers which you've quoted. I am asking thus because I am still not able to understand how the integer count is limited to 5.
Would be grateful if you can elaborate a bit.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:07 pm
adthedaddy wrote:How many integers 'n' are there such that r<n<s ?
(1) s-r=5
(2) r & s are not integers

In the OG Quant guide, the ans is given as C. In my opinion, the ans should be E.
Plz suggest.
Why does statement 2 require that r and s not be integers?
Because this condition likely affects STATEMENT 1.
Thus, when we evaluate statement 1, we must be sure to consider both INTEGER and NON-INTEGER values.

Statement 1: s = r+5.
Case 1: r and s are INTEGERS
If r=0, then s=5, yielding 4 possible values for n: 1, 2, 3, 4.
Case 2: r and s are NON-INTEGERS
If r=.5, then s=5.5, yielding 5 possible values for n: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: r and s are not integers
Since r and s could be ANY non-integers such that r<s, INSUFFICIENT.

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
As we saw in case 2, if r and s are non-integer values such that s=r+5, there will be 5 integer values between them.
To illustrate:
If r=7.2, then s=12.2, yielding 5 possible values for n: 8, 9, 10, 11, 12.
If r=1003.1, then s=1008.1, yielding 5 possible values for n: 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008.
Since in each case there are 5 integers between r and s, SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by anuprajan5 » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:15 pm
adthedaddy wrote:Hi Anup,

You're getting the set as 6,7,8,9 while earlier another member solved it ans got it as {2,3,4,5,6}
Which one should be correct ?

In my opinion, there cannot be any fixed value for which you can get s-r=5 where r,s are non-integers
e.g. 10.1-5.1=5
10.2-5.2=5
10.3-5.3=5,... and so on... the count is unlimited.

How are you able to get a fixed range of nos viz. {6,7,8,9,10} or {2,3,4,5,6} ??

Taking your examples, on the number line, the integers between 5.1 and 10.1 are 6,7,8,9 and 10.
Similar for 5.2 and 10.2 and so on.

If you had 2 integers for r and s, then the number of integers between them would only be 4. For example between 5 and 10, the integers would be 6,7,8 and 9.

Hence it was essential for statement 2 to tell us that r and s were non integers and for statement 1 to define the relationship between r and s.

Regards
Anup
Join the discussion

by adthedaddy » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:38 pm
Thanks a lot friends... Finally I am through :-) :-) :-)
Join the discussion