josbilou wrote:LastChanceMBA wrote:First, this person who got in with a 580 is obviously a very special case, and I'm sure he/she has a remarkable resume and personal story. So unless you accomplished something truly remarkable (Rhodes scholar, saved a village, escaped a war torn country, NFL player, founded a startup worth $10 million+, etc.) don't expect to get into HBS with a 590. Study hard, and try your best to raise it to at least 680+.
Second, be very skeptical of Aringo or any other consulting firm when they brag about clients with low GMAT scores who got into top b-schools. Now I'm not accusing them of lying. However, unless you know the exact background and experience of the candidate in question, you're not getting any useful information that is relevant to YOU. After all let's be honest. A white/Asian guy in banking is not getting in with a 580 or some other subpar score. The ugly truth is that admission consultants actually can't help you that much with getting into top schools.
When you hire a consultant you don't need to know anything about any other client of theirs. Everyone is a unique case. In my experience, though I didn't have such a low GMAT, only a good consultant can help you to make the most of the rest of your application. Money is the main drawback and it's a big one, but if you are applying to the top schools the consultants have the first-hand experience to make you sound worthwhile.They know what the adcoms are looking for.
I respectfully disagree. It matters because you are competing against those with similar background, whether demographics or industry. The former NFL cornerback who is a first-year at HBS and scored 570 on the GMAT or ex-Navy Seals, do not tell me anything about my chances because they are in their own unique groups and competing against those who are similar. It is a well-known fact that the admissions bar is higher for white/Asian males in finance/consulting or Indian males in IT. It's not politically correct to say this, but it's true.
Now back to Aringo and consultants in general. I had free consultations with many companies including Aringo. The Aringo lady brought up how a lot of their clients with sub-700 GMAT scores got into elite b-schools. I asked her, "Ok that's nice, but how many of them were Asian males in finance?" (my background). She hesitated for a few seconds and replied "Well, we are not allowed to divulge any information about our clients." I then made the points that I made in the preceding paragraph, and she was unable to provide a good response.
I'm not saying that consultants can't help. I'm sure some of them are good. But by and large, I think they are vastly overrated and provide a service whose value is questionable and cannot be empirically verified. If someone gets into a program of their choice they may say that a consultant helped make it happen. But how do we know that? This is pure conjecture since we don't know what the outcome would have been if he had not used a consultant. He may be a superstar who would've gotten in anyways; we just don't know.