-
anticipation
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:52 am
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
If zt < -3, is z < 4 ? (1) z < 9 (2) t < -4
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
zt < -3 { we judge that one has to be negative and other one has to be positive}anticipation wrote:If zt < -3, is z < 4 ?
(1) z < 9
(2) t < -4
is z < 4 ( we rewrite this as is 0 < z < 4 { is z positive } or 0 > z { or z negative } )
(1) z < 9
It can be any value either positive or negative
insufficient
( 2 ) t < -4
t is negative , so z has to be positive
But still it can be greater or less than 4
so should plug in some values.
t = -5 , z = 6 tz = -30
t = -6 , z = 1 tz = -6
in both the tz is less than -3 and the value of z can be less than or greater than 4
so insufficient
Even by considering both the statements, condition is still the same,
so my answer is E,
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------
EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
[email protected]
-------------------------
EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Hi Ron, Mitch, Brent and other experts:
When you guys do this(number picking) it seems so easy! However, number picking is my Achilles' Heel. It is just so frustratingly difficult for me to come up with right numbers.
When I micro-analyze my thinking process while I try to come up with right values to show counter examples this is what I see: I first need to ensure z <9 and then make sure that t < -4 and then ensure that zt< -3 with the aim of getting a NO for z<4. Even though I am using 'then' after every decision, the fact is- to generate right values, you essentially need to make these 4 decisions simultaneously. I simply dont know how I can do this in 20-30 seconds without befuddling my short term memory apparatus. I am saying 20-30 secs cuz in most of the hard questions you will have to rule out st-A, st-B and A+B as it comes down to E/C. thus you will make 5-6 such decisions for every question.
When I solve such questions I am either totally flustered or take more than 4 mins. Are there efficient ways to do this and which will work for most of the hard problems (inequality, modulus, reciprocal, neg/pos and their combination) etc..in less than 2-3 mins?
Thanks!
When you guys do this(number picking) it seems so easy! However, number picking is my Achilles' Heel. It is just so frustratingly difficult for me to come up with right numbers.
When I micro-analyze my thinking process while I try to come up with right values to show counter examples this is what I see: I first need to ensure z <9 and then make sure that t < -4 and then ensure that zt< -3 with the aim of getting a NO for z<4. Even though I am using 'then' after every decision, the fact is- to generate right values, you essentially need to make these 4 decisions simultaneously. I simply dont know how I can do this in 20-30 seconds without befuddling my short term memory apparatus. I am saying 20-30 secs cuz in most of the hard questions you will have to rule out st-A, st-B and A+B as it comes down to E/C. thus you will make 5-6 such decisions for every question.
When I solve such questions I am either totally flustered or take more than 4 mins. Are there efficient ways to do this and which will work for most of the hard problems (inequality, modulus, reciprocal, neg/pos and their combination) etc..in less than 2-3 mins?
Thanks!
When given a threshold, test EXTREMES: one value close to the threshold, one value far from the threshold.mensanumber wrote:Hi Ron, Mitch, Brent and other experts:
When you guys do this(number picking) it seems so easy! However, number picking is my Achilles' Heel. It is just so frustratingly difficult for me to come up with right numbers.
When I micro-analyze my thinking process while I try to come up with right values to show counter examples this is what I see: I first need to ensure z <9 and then make sure that t < -4 and then ensure that zt< -3 with the aim of getting a NO for z<4. Even though I am using 'then' after every decision, the fact is- to generate right values, you essentially need to make these 4 decisions simultaneously. I simply dont know how I can do this in 20-30 seconds without befuddling my short term memory apparatus. I am saying 20-30 secs cuz in most of the hard questions you will have to rule out st-A, st-B and A+B as it comes down to E/C. thus you will make 5-6 such decisions for every question.
When I solve such questions I am either totally flustered or take more than 4 mins. Are there efficient ways to do this and which will work for most of the hard problems (inequality, modulus, reciprocal, neg/pos and their combination) etc..in less than 2-3 mins?
Thanks!
In statement 1, the threshold for z is 9.If zt < -3, is z < 4 ?
(1) z < 9
(2) t < -4
Case 1: z=8
Since zt < -3, we get:
8t < -3
t < -3/8.
Thus, it's possible that z=8 and t=-5.
In this case, both statements are satisfied and z>4.
Case 2: z=1
Since zt < -3, we get:
(1)(t) < -3
t < -3.
Thus, it's possible that z=1 and t=-5.
In this case, both statements are satisfied and z<4.
Thus, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
















