BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

another weird DS question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by parallel_chase » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:01 am
Well the answer is C. This is very tricky question.

If you look at the Statement I it says:

The cows are more than twice the number of pigs. But we dont know the value of more.
Pigs could be 10 then cows would be 10 more than twice the number of pigs.
Similarly pigs could be any value between 1-13. I say 13 because if there are more than 13 pigs then this statement will have no meaning.Therefore insufficient.

Statement II pigs are more than 12. It does not tell us anything about the cows. Therefore Insufficient.

If you combine both the statements, first statement says pigs 1-13, seond statement says more than 12. Hence C is the answer.

Let me know if you still have any doubts.
Join the discussion

by flystud777 » Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:54 am
i get it now. i was misreading the first statement. i thought it meant twice as many cows vs pigs instead of MORE than twice.

thanks for your input
Join the discussion

by muzali » Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:35 pm
Not clear to me....would like to get a dumbed down explanation.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:49 pm
Question stem:

Let x be the no of pigs
Let y be the number of cows

Given x+y=40

Stmt I

y>2x

x could be 10 y could be 30
x could be 12 y could be 28

INSUFF

Stmt II

x>12
x -13 y=27
x-14 y=26

INSUFF

Combining statements I and II

x+y=40 (1)

y>2x (2)

x>12 (3)

Adding (2) and (3) (inequalities facing same direction can be added)

x+y>2x+12
y>x+12

y>40-y+12 (since from (1) x= 40-y)

2y>52
y>26

The only number satisfying stmt I and II is x=13 y=27

Therefore there are 27 cows(more than twicw the number of pigs i.e more than 26 which is statement I) and 13 pigs (more than 12 pigs which is statement II)

One definite answer

C)

Hope I dint miss something here! Let me know if u still have questions.
Join the discussion

by muzali » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:33 pm
My bad, I was reading "2/3 are either pigs or cows" as 40 animals are either cows or 40 animals are either pigs!!!

Thanks for the explanation though....
Join the discussion