BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Analysis of Argument - Template - Premise or Assumption?

Critical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension
This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:14 am
Thanked: 1 times

Analysis of Argument - Template - Premise or Assumption?

by John Faber » Sat Feb 26, 2011 1:38 pm
Hey guys,

I used the template provided here: https://www.beatthegmat.com/argument-ess ... 38032.html a couple of times and I really really like it. However, I don't understand when do draw a distinction between premise and assumption. In general I understand what the difference is, just in the context of an analysis of an argument I don't. I am taking my test on Monday and I am going nuts here. Could somebody, maybe based on the very first Analysis of an Argument Statement on page 796 in the OG 12, explain me what the difference is?

THANKS :)
Top
Source: — Verbal Reasoning |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:24 pm
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:6 members

by navami » Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:31 pm
Assumption is information unstated that, when added to the premises, proves the conclusion.

The assumption underlying a conditional statement is that the necessary condition must occur in order for the sufficient condition to occur. The assumption in these arguments always protects the necessary condition.

Premise indicators:
because
since
for
for example
for the reason that
in that
given that
as indicated by
due to
owing to
this can be seen from
we know this by
Furthermore
Moreover
Besides
In addition
What's more
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times
Followed by:365 members

by VivianKerr » Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:37 am
I think of it like Evidence (stated facts) + Assumptions (unstated facts) = Conclusion.

The assumptions are what need to be true in order for the given evidence to logically lead to the stated conclusion.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:48 am
Thanked: 1 times

by talueng » Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:49 am
I am opening this again because the replies above don't satisfy me. Can someone please elaborate the difference between a premise and an assumption?

Is it correct to say that a premise can be (but not necessarily has to be) an assumption made?

For instance, in:
"Since all men are mortal and Socrates is a man, Socrates is mortal."

The premises for the conclusion that Socrates is mortal is that "all men are mortal" and "Socrates is a man". While both are premises, the first premise, "all men are mortal" is an assumption.

In sum, a premise is a claim that is a reason for, or an objection against, a conclusion in an argument. A might be an assumption or be based on an assumption, but could as well be a fact or be based on a fact.


Please also clarify what a stimulus is in the context of an argument or passage to read.
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:25 am

by Ruca » Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:28 am
I also have a problem understanding the difference between the two. Is there anyone who could explain?

Thanks in advance
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:02 pm

by chojung » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:14 pm
"All men are mortal, therefore Socrates is mortal"

Premise: All men are mortal
Assertion: Socrates is mortal

Assumption: Socrates is a man (unstated condition)
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1